Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Natural Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee backs half-point coal severance cut; senators dispute effect on production and permanent funds
Summary
The Senate Committee of the Whole recommended passage of House Bill 75, which would cut the coal severance tax by half a percentage point. Debate focused on whether the small rate change would affect production or merely transfer value to shareholders, and on impacts to the state general fund and permanent mineral funds.
The Wyoming Senate's Committee of the Whole moved a favorable recommendation on House Bill 75, a proposal to lower the coal severance tax by 0.5 percentage points. The measure was presented as a step to align the coal rate more closely with oil and gas and other minerals.
Senator Mark Barlow, one of the bill sponsors, told senators the change is intended to create a more level playing field: “We just want to make sure that we have that level playing field when it comes to severance tax,” he said, describing the proposal as the second step in a phased reduction.
The fiscal note discussed during debate projected an $8–$9 million annual reduction in revenue to the state if the change is enacted. Several senators pressed whether that loss would materially affect coal production. Senator Chris Case, who voted against the committee recommendation, and others argued the severance reduction is unlikely to change plant dispatch or production decisions given broader market forces such as natural gas prices and rail transportation costs.
Senator R.J. Rothfuss and others urged new analysis, pointing to prior revenue‑committee work that questioned whether tax incentives for manufacturing and minerals had produced net fiscal benefit. Senator Rafas cited corporate financial activity, noting a major coal producer’s recent shareholder returns and buybacks, and warned that reduced severance receipts could benefit investors rather than fund local reinvestment.
Supporters from coal-producing districts said the cut would help keep mines operating and preserve local jobs. Senator Dan Dockstader and others described coal’s local economic contributions and said modest tax relief could help sustain communities that rely on coal employment and related services.
Senators also discussed the distributional effects: several speakers stressed that the bill does not touch the 1.5% constitutionally mandated deposit to the Permanent Wyoming Mineral Trust Fund, but that the proposed reduction would lower current‑use revenue available to the general fund and local programs. Debate included comparisons to neighboring states’ rates and reminders that transportation costs and market demand, not severance tax alone, drive competitiveness.
After extended debate the Committee of the Whole adopted the motion to report House Bill 75 favorably to the Senate. The transcript shows the committee action; a final third‑reading floor vote is not recorded in the excerpt provided.
