Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Brown Act Teleconferencing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clerk briefs council on Brown Act teleconferencing limits, AB 1170 Form 700 changes and upcoming ethics training
Summary
City Clerk summarized recent state changes affecting remote participation limits under the Brown Act, a new electronic filing requirement for Form 700 (AB 1170) and scheduled a mandatory ethics training session for council members.
The City Clerk briefed the City Council on recent state law changes affecting council operations, teleconferencing and conflict-of-interest filings.
The clerk said amendments to the Brown Act now limit “just cause” remote participation (examples given: childcare, illness, official travel) to no more than two meetings per year; remote participation for emergency physical or medical circumstances remains permitted but requires the participant to announce a general description of the circumstances and council approval of the participation. The clerk summarized total allowances saying members may not exceed five remote-participation meetings in total under the described rules and noted the teleconferencing provision sunsets on Jan. 1, 2026 unless extended; after that date, remote participation would revert to traditional Brown Act requirements (a physical satellite location for public participation).
The clerk also briefed council on AB 1170, which requires Form 700 filers (members of the council file as 87200 filers) to submit statements of economic interests directly to the Fair Political Practices Commission using its electronic system (via Granicus), eliminating paper Form 700 filings. The clerk advised that questions about filing obligations should be directed to the FPPC or the city attorney and announced an ethics-training session scheduled for Jan. 30 (virtual, two-hour session with BBK attorneys), which will meet the two-hour renewal requirement; councilmembers were told to contact Erica to register.
The clerk reviewed best practices for the mayor and mayor pro tem (presiding officer duties, the ability to limit public-comment time in large meetings and signing ordinances/proclamations) and reiterated the role of council liaisons to advisory bodies: liaisons may provide information but should not attempt to influence advisory bodies’ deliberations and should, if they need action taken by the council, bring it to the council meeting rather than the advisory body.
Mayor-level remarks during the discussion reiterated the clerk’s guidance and reminded councilmembers to preserve decorum and avoid communicating outside a public meeting in ways that would risk Brown Act violations.
Ending: The council received the clerk’s informational briefing; no formal action was taken. Staff scheduled ethics training and signaled additional legal support is available for questions about Form 700 filing obligations.
