Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pedestrian Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council signals preference for pavers in El Paseo raised mid‑block crosswalks

2307602 · January 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After staff presented material options, councilors and the El Paseo Business Improvement District favored paver or stone applications rather than painted asphalt for new raised crosswalks to improve durability and aesthetics.

The Palm Desert City Council on Jan. 9 gave direction to staff to proceed with planning for additional raised mid‑block crosswalks on El Paseo and indicated a preference for paver or stone surfaces over painted asphalt.

Public Works Director Martin Albers reviewed proposed locations and material options, including keeping an asphalt look, colored asphalt with floral patterns, concrete, or pavers. Patrick Klein, general manager for The Gardens on El Paseo and president of the El Paseo Parking & Business Improvement District, told the council the BID supports a paver or stone treatment that complements existing sidewalks and the district's aesthetic.

Why it matters: speakers and councilors said raised crosswalks slow vehicle speeds, improve pedestrian safety and contribute to El Paseo's visual character. Council members asked staff to return to the active transportation committee with detailed cost comparisons and to ensure the chosen material is consistent with adjacent existing pavers.

Technical notes: staff said several RRFB (rectangular rapid flashing beacon) systems will be replaced or upgraded to meet current safety standards; one planned closure or construction window was described as part of the paving project.

Next steps: staff will present material options and cost estimates to the active transportation committee and return to council with a recommended design and budget. No formal final design or funding appropriation was adopted on Jan. 9.