Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pole Attachments Law Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House advances bill allowing law enforcement pole attachments with hold‑harmless for utilities amid privacy concerns
Summary
House Bill 2,109, which authorizes law-enforcement attachments to utility poles under written agreements and provides hold-harmless protections to utilities, was reported favorably after extended floor debate and a roll-call vote of 77–44.
House Bill 2,109 — a measure authorizing law enforcement agencies to attach and operate equipment on utility poles and public rights-of-way under pole-attachment agreements and providing hold-harmless protections to public utilities — was reported favorably by the Committee of the Whole after prolonged floor debate and a roll-call on the motion to report.
The bill requires written agreements between law enforcement agencies and public utilities specifying the poles involved, the nature of the law enforcement equipment, safety and security specifications, and that law enforcement agencies indemnify utilities for liabilities arising from the attachments. Sponsors said the provision codifies a practice that has been in place for years and would allow utilities to charge reasonable administrative fees to recover costs (but not charge for space used). The bill also designates public utilities as instrumentalities of government under the Kansas Tort Claims Act to provide certain liability protections.
Supporters, including the Kansas Sheriffs Association and several police organizations, said the arrangements help public safety. Representative Wilborn, the carrier, said: "Make no mistake about it. This is a whole harmless bill for the utilities when entering the pole attachment agreements with law enforcement agencies upon request." He and others said the measure is intended to keep utilities from being drawn into litigation for law enforcement actions.
Opponents and skeptics raised privacy and oversight concerns. Representative Carmichael and others described the potential for surveillance creep and the need to secure sensitive data; Representative Carr urged colleagues to oppose the bill, saying it would disproportionately affect underserved communities and remove civil-liability recourse for residents. Carr said, "I would urge the body, to vote along with me against this, against this house bill 21 0 9." Representative Schreiber, citing utility reliability concerns, supported the bill on grounds it provides certainty about placement and maintenance and can protect grid reliability.
The committee record included proponents such as the Kansas Sheriffs Association, chiefs’ groups, the state fire marshal and the Wichita Police Department; neutral testimony came from the Kansas Department of Transportation and the Citizens Utility Ratepayer Board, which noted potential administrative costs. Sponsors said an estimated administrative fiscal note for some entities could be about $3,000.
On a roll call opened after a challenged voice vote, the chair recorded 77 yeas and 44 nays; the chair declared the motion carried and the Committee of the Whole recommendation adopted. The committee report was later adopted by the House.
Discussion vs. decision: The debate on HB 2,109 included operational and liability clarifications, privacy and data-security concerns, and reliability considerations. The House adopted the Committee of the Whole report favorably; the bill moves forward under the House calendar for subsequent steps.
