Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Moratorium topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pico Rivera council approves temporary moratorium on certain building-materials and rental-yard uses

2305115 · February 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Council voted 5-0 to impose a moratorium prohibiting new or expanded building-materials sales, storage, contractor equipment storage and rental-yard uses while staff studies related land-use and regulatory issues.

The Pico Rivera City Council on Feb. 11 voted unanimously to impose a temporary moratorium restricting the establishment, expansion or modification of building-materials sales and storage, contractor equipment storage, and rental-yard uses.

The moratorium passed on a 5-0 roll call after a brief staff check-in. City Manager (addressing the council) said he and the Community and Economic Development director were available to answer questions; no substantive amendments were made before the motion was moved by Council member Eric Lutz and seconded by Council member Laura. The council recorded yes votes from Council member Laura; Council member Eric Lutz; Dr. Monica Sanchez; Mayor Pro Tem Camacho; and Mayor Garcia.

The moratorium was described on the council dais as a pause to allow staff to review zoning, permit conditions and potential impacts of specific industrial or contractor-related uses in the city. No ordinance number, effective period, or explicit sunset date was stated in the public remarks. The motion carried by roll call 5-0 and the council did not attach additional conditions on the floor.

Council members did not place additional restrictions on duration or scope during the meeting. The item will now proceed through staff review; the council directed staff availability for questions but did not adopt implementing language during the Feb. 11 meeting.

The moratorium is intended as an interim land-use measure while the city evaluates appropriate zoning or permit changes. The council did not state whether the moratorium would be followed by an ordinance, an urgency ordinance, or a separate resolution; staff follow-up to the council was indicated but no timeline or next step was specified during the meeting.

Votes at a glance: Motion to approve moratorium — moved by Council member Eric Lutz; seconded by Council member Laura; outcome: approved, 5-0.

What happens next: Staff will prepare follow-up materials and legal/administrative recommendations for future council consideration; council members asked staff to be available for questions during that review.