Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Food Labeling Origin topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances country‑of‑origin labeling bill for beef after debate on enforceability and scope
Summary
Senate File 84, requiring labeling that identifies beef born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the United States, passed the committee 8–1 amid debate about whether Wyoming should require U.S.-level or state-level origin claims and whether enforcement is feasible without federal tracking requirements.
Senate File 84, a measure to require country‑of‑origin labeling for beef that is “born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the United States,” passed the Agriculture, State & Public Lands & Water Resources Committee 8–1 after extensive testimony on traceability, enforcement and potential market effects.
Senator Sherry Steinmetz, sponsor of the bill, said the measure was aimed at ensuring consumers know when beef is fully a U.S. product: “Beef that is derived from cattle born, raised, slaughtered and processed in The United States Of America shall clearly be labeled as a product of The United States Of America.” She added the bill would allow existing local or Wyoming labels to remain in use: “Beef labeled as United States Of America beef shall include meat processed and clearly labeled as Wyoming beef, local beef or beef with some other specific indicator.”
Doug Miyamoto of the Department of Agriculture supported the bill’s intent but cautioned the department could face enforcement limits because mandatory country‑of‑origin tracking for beef was effectively suspended at the federal level after a World Trade Organization ruling. Miyamoto told the committee that “it would be difficult for us to implement this legislation as it's currently worded because some of our local retailers and wholesalers can't tell us nor can they find out if beef coming from outside the state is born, raised, and slaughtered in The United States.” He suggested a narrower, enforceable alternative that limits a state label to beef that is verified within Wyoming: the department can verify carcasses processed in Wyoming and could enforce a “Product of Wyoming” claim.
Industry and retail witnesses described operational challenges. Sarah Pettit of Associated Food Stores, a regional wholesaler serving independent grocers, said warehouse segregation and labeling would add complexity and cost: “It would make the beef site less efficient, and, therefore, we would need to find additional ways to segregate that beef,” which she said could raise consumer prices. Jim McGagna (Wyoming Stockers Association) and other producer witnesses said they support country‑of‑origin labeling for transparency and local marketing but echoed concerns about implementation at scale and suggested focusing on labeling imported product or on state-level verification where the Department of Agriculture can confirm origin.
A committee member offered an amendment suggested by the Department of Agriculture that would narrow the claim to beef “born, raised and slaughtered in the state of Wyoming at a state-licensed meat establishment,” an option some witnesses said they could verify and enforce. Representative Provenza moved the department amendment on the floor but it failed on a voice vote; the committee then voted on the bill as introduced.
Recorded votes: Representative Banks, Representative Davis, Representative Eklund, Representative Johnson, Representative Otman, Representative Schmid, Representative Strauch and Chairman Winter voted aye; Representative Provenza voted no. The committee reported the bill favorably 8–1 to the next stage.
