Putnam schools outline materials-adoption schedule for interventions, personal finance course
Loading...
Summary
District staff presented a schedule for textbook and curriculum adoptions including K–4 math intervention, K–3 ELA intervention and a new 9–12 personal financial literacy course; the timeline sets public comment and vote dates this spring.
District curriculum staff told the board they will begin the formal local adoption process this spring for multiple instructional materials, including K–4 mathematics intervention, K–3 English language arts intervention and a new personal financial literacy course for grades 9–12.
The staff presentation, given by the district’s curriculum representative identified in the meeting as Ms. Azula, said the district will review publisher proposals, invite teacher and parent reviewers, and hold public comment before a board vote.
"We will come back to you March 25. At that board meeting, that's when I'll do the long presentation with each of the curriculums that we are considering," Ms. Azula said. She later corrected the calendar dates in the meeting: materials will be presented on March 25 to open a 20-day public comment window; the board vote is scheduled for April 15; and the district will reserve May 20 as a special meeting date if the 30-day contest period requires an additional hearing.
Staff said the district opted not to participate in this year's statewide K–12 English language arts adoption cycle because many publishers did not submit materials; instead, the district will evaluate local submissions and revisit statewide options next year.
Ms. Azula said the review process includes teacher reviewers, parent nominations and in-service credit for participating educators. She told the board the district will schedule publisher demonstrations in February and will provide materials and structured time for reviewers to work during the school day.
Board members asked whether the district had identified who would teach the new personal financial literacy course; Ms. Azula said administrators will select teachers with relevant experience and may invite potential instructors to the review process. The presentation did not include a formal board vote; it set the public-review and voting calendar for spring.
