Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board receives refresher training on fiduciary duties, delegation and conflicts of interest
Summary
Legal counsel provided a refresher covering five constitutional fiduciary duties, the primacy of duty of loyalty, duty of prudence and the board’s duty to delegate and to monitor delegates; trustees discussed delegation, manager selection and monitoring obligations.
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The board received an annual fiduciary training focused on constitutional fiduciary duties, the practical meaning of loyalty and prudence, and guidance on delegation and monitoring.
The presenter said five core fiduciary duties govern public retirement boards: the duty of loyalty (primary), the exclusive‑benefit rule, the duty of prudence (a heightened standard), the duty to diversify and the duty to follow plan documents (which include the constitution, municipal code, the board’s charters and IRS rules for tax‑qualified status).
The presenter emphasized the duty of loyalty requires trustees to act solely in the interest of plan members and beneficiaries, not on behalf of appointing authorities or other stakeholders. The duty of prudence was described as a process‑oriented standard that requires trustees to obtain and monitor expertise, delegate where appropriate and then actively supervise delegates. Attendees discussed examples including investment manager selection, monitoring manager performance, and whether consultants’ advice relieves trustees of responsibility.
The presenter referenced O'Neill v. Stanislaus County as a landmark case illustrating prudence and stakeholder balancing in pension governance and recommended trustees pursue continuing education on actuarial and investment topics.
Ending: Trustees asked questions about monitoring delegated authority and how to revisit delegation; counsel advised the board can rescind delegations or seek second expert opinions if trustees have concerns and should document deliberative process in open meetings.

