Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Membership Website topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee names nominees, plans historical subcommittee and unified signage and website work

2301467 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee identified three nominees for commissioner consideration, discussed forming a historical subcommittee, and outlined plans for a county website, uniform signs with QR codes and cross‑promotion.

The Linn County eCommunity / Economic Development Committee said it will forward three nominees to the county commissioners and discussed plans for a historical subcommittee, a unified signage standard for county properties and development of the committee’s website.

A committee member said she planned to bring three District 3 candidates — Janet Jackson, Ashley Allen and Kenny Otto — to the commissioners for approval next month. Members also said one District 1 seat remained open and asked colleagues to suggest candidates to fill it before the next meeting.

Committee members described forming a historical society subcommittee to coordinate local museums and historical organizations. Members discussed meeting patterns (quarterly suggested), the need for a single point of contact for event listings, and cross‑promotion of events so smaller organizations share audience exposure rather than competing for the same date.

On signage, the committee discussed creating a uniform county sign for use on county property that would include the county logo and a QR code linking to related content. The committee said the QR code should connect users to event listings or to a site showing the next related location.

Members also discussed the committee’s website and the vendor model. One member said the group has considered paying an up‑front site build fee plus a maintenance subscription; an approximate vendor model discussed in the meeting included a development fee and an ongoing monthly maintenance charge (figures discussed informally). The committee agreed that a single person or department should be responsible for uploading and coordinating content to ensure consistency.

The group reviewed bylaws language and noted a bylaw provision referring to annual dues (bylaw section 2) that several members said could be removed. No formal bylaw amendment vote was recorded at the meeting; members discussed whether to bring proposed edits as motions at a future meeting.

The committee scheduled its next meeting for Feb. 18 at 9 a.m., and members said March would be adjusted around the Youth Entrepreneurship Challenge schedule.