Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Of Equalization topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County Council ratifies 2023 Board of Equalization decision adjusting values on 72 parcels

2297663 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Cache County Council unanimously ratified a Board of Equalization (BOE) decision that reduced market values across 72 parcels for tax year 2023, triggering refund calculations to taxpayers and potential further appeals to the State Tax Commission.

The Cache County Council ratified a Board of Equalization decision on Feb. 11 that adjusted the 2023 market values for 72 parcels, the council heard.

The ratification follows a BOE hearing and a subsequent local appraisal review. County staff said the taxpayer had sought a $12 million reduction in assessed value but received a $1.8 million adjustment from the assessor’s pre-BOE values; the council decision reduced the market value further by about $5.9 million, producing a combined adjustment of nearly $8 million across the 72 parcels. Council members moved and seconded the motion to ratify the BOE decision, which passed unanimously.

The tax-office staff explained that because the tax roll for 2023 is closed, the county will calculate refunds based on the difference between the tax notices already issued and the newly ratified values and will add PTIF interest dating to payment. The treasurer’s office will process the refunds when it files end-of-year reporting with the state; staff said the accounting reduces future assessed value and could slightly affect future tax rates.

County staff also told the council the taxpayer has appealed some rulings to the State Tax Commission and that the case could proceed to district court if the commission’s decision does not resolve the dispute.

Council members asked for clarity about how refunds are processed and how values translate to tax dollars; staff reiterated that the $5.9 million figure reflects market-value adjustments, not cash paid by the county. The council approved the ratification without recorded opposition.

The council also authorized a set of post-BOE corrections to the tax roll (parcel additions, removals from exemptions, greenbelt corrections and one newly discovered house), noting these administrative corrections require legislative consent when processed after May 22 of the tax year.

The council moved out of the BOE and resumed regular session following votes on the ratification and roll corrections. Ending: County staff said they will compute exact refund amounts and return to treasury procedures for issuance; the matter may reappear if higher appeals change the result.