Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Inspections Process Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves outside review of inspection, permitting and complaint processes after debate over SeeClickFix reports
Summary
The Oshkosh Common Council approved a professional services agreement with Matrix Consulting Group to review inspection, permitting and fee processes after council members raised concerns that SeeClickFix reports and routine complaint follow‑ups were creating heavy workloads for inspectors and producing perceived "gotcha" enforcement.
The Oshkosh Common Council on Feb. 11 approved a professional services contract with Matrix Consulting Group to conduct an assessment of inspection, permits and fee processes and the city’s development review workflow.
Council members flagged concerns about SeeClickFix (Connect Oshkosh) reports that prompt routine inspections, saying many complaints are minor or stem from neighbor disputes and that inspectors are being required to follow up on every item. Council member Larson said inspectors are sometimes dispatched to check vehicle registrations and yard items; he called the volume and type of follow-up “a lot of work” and said the practice risks diverting inspectors from safety‑critical duties.
The contract for an outside review was presented as a way to identify process and culture changes. Mayor pro tem and other council members said a third‑party review could recommend triage rules, clarify which complaints require immediate site visits and advise when staff should focus on education rather than enforcement. Interim City Manager Fitzpatrick and staff welcomed the input and said they would use the consultant’s recommendations to set future policy.
The resolution approving Matrix Consulting Group passed on a 5‑0 roll call (Council members Nichols, Larson, Eslinger, Flom and Buol voting aye). Staff said the firm will provide presentations to council and that a full report would be provided when available. Council member Eslinger noted the contract was “just shy of $134,000,” a figure mentioned during debate.
Council members and staff said they expect the review to include recommendations on how SeeClickFix reports are screened and how inspectors prioritize follow‑ups, and to propose training or procedural changes so the inspections division focuses on safety and major code violations. Staff indicated the consultant’s final deliverable and presentation will be shared with council.
The council and staff also discussed interim measures: clarifying whether certain non‑safety complaints must trigger on‑site inspections, and whether the city should change its current workflow that automatically requires an inspector visit for every SeeClickFix complaint. Director Kelly (staff) told council the city follows council direction and is prepared to adjust practices based on council policy.
The Matrix Consulting agreement was one of several items on the meeting agenda that prompted conversation about code enforcement priorities and customer service.
Council members said they want the process to produce clearer guidance for staff and clearer expectations for residents about what types of complaints will be investigated and when enforcement versus education will be used.
