Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts objective noise standard for amplified sound in defined public spaces
Summary
Council amended municipal code chapters 9.36 and 9.4 to add an objective standard: amplified noise or repetitive percussive noise that can be heard 75 feet or more from a stationary source on specified public property will be presumptively unreasonable and unlawful in defined commercial/shared public spaces.
Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Santa Cruz City Council on Tuesday adopted amendments to the municipal code to add an objective noise standard for amplified sound and certain repetitive percussive noises on public property in defined commercial and shared public spaces.
Council members Bruner and Newsom sponsored the ordinance amendments, which establish that amplified noise or repetitive percussive noise that can be heard 75 feet or more from a stationary source on a public street, sidewalk, alley, right-of-way, park or other public property in specified commercial areas will be presumed unreasonable and unlawful under the city's noise code. City Attorney staff and police raised enforceability concerns about decibel limits and supported a distance-based standard modeled on California Vehicle Code enforcement techniques.
City Attorney counsel explained the drafting goal was a narrowly tailored rule to reduce impacts on businesses, offices and medical facilities downtown while protecting expression and assembly rights; the proposed standard applies only in defined commercial districts to help meet First Amendment tailoring requirements. Council member O'Hara raised the possibility of expanding the standard to additional commercial areas and public spaces and later proposed a broader substitute amendment to apply the standard across more public spaces; the substitute motion failed and council then voted for the original proposed amendment.
Law enforcement told council enforcement would be complaint-driven rather than proactive patrols; officers can measure distance and corroborate audible complaints via body-worn cameras, staff said. The ordinance passed on council vote; the clerk recorded ayes from a majority of members.
Public commenters expressed both support and concern: some residents cited impacts on hearing and downtown workers; others worried about effects on artistic expression and free speech. Council members and staff said existing permit processes for public gatherings remain for organized events and emphasized the amendment targets unamplified or amplified disturbances in high-impact public commercial areas.
The ordinance language adopted narrows the geographic scope to the commercial districts specified in the draft; staff said they will continue to refine enforcement guidance and provide training to officers before the rule is applied widely.

