Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Septic To Sewer Fees Waivers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners agree to waive customer deposits for county‑mandated septic‑to‑sewer connections and ask staff to study permit fee adjustments
Summary
After lengthy public comment, the board unanimously approved waiving utility deposit requirements for homeowners connecting to county sewer under grant‑funded septic‑to‑sewer projects, asked staff to explore making certain building‑permit fees zero for grant‑funded connections, and directed clearer guidance on project funding and homeowner costs.
Get email alerts on the Septic To Sewer Fees Waivers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of County Commissioners voted 5‑0 to waive the county utility deposit requirement for homeowners required to connect to sewer under county‑led, grant‑funded septic‑to‑sewer projects and directed staff to examine whether building‑permit fees for those specific, grant‑funded projects could be set to zero.
Commissioner Diana Finnegan presented the motion, after an extended discussion among commissioners and public commenters about the total out‑of‑pocket cost to homeowners who must hook up to sewer systems. Finnegan summarized typical homeowner outlays: the county availability assessment (often roughly $5,000–$6,000 per assessment unit in prior examples), a connection charge to the county water/sewer enterprise (staff estimated about $2,833.94 for this project series), plumbing and contractor costs (commonly $1,000–$3,000), septic abandonment (roughly $2,000), building‑permit fees (county estimate $54 plus $25 in a flood zone), utility deposits and lot repairs — producing a combined estimate that in staff and public examples approached $12,000–$14,000 per household.
Finnegan asked staff to pursue changes to reduce homeowner burdens where the county is driving connections as part of grant‑funded projects. The board agreed to two interim steps: (1) waive the additional utility deposit for households already connected to county water when they hook up to sewer under a county‑led, grant‑funded project; and (2) direct staff to prepare a resolution and fee‑schedule change for the board’s consideration that would establish a special fee category for grant‑funded septic‑to‑sewer projects (with the aim of potentially setting the building‑permit fee at $0 for those circumstances). Commissioners asked that staff also continue to pursue grant matches and state funding so that assessments and homeowner out‑of‑pocket costs can be reduced.
Commissioners debated but did not remove the county’s connection charge and the adopted availability assessment methodology; several commissioners stressed the need for fiscal prudence (to ensure enterprise funds can pay their obligations) while easing homeowner burdens where possible. Commissioner Jeff Kennard proposed rescinding the county’s participation in a separate residential financing program (PACE) elsewhere on the agenda; that separate motion did not carry as a rescission, and the board instead asked for a workshop on PACE and related consumer protections.
Why it matters: County‑sponsored septic‑to‑sewer conversions affect homeowner costs, public health and environmental protection. The board’s actions reduce an immediate fee burden (deposits) for affected homeowners and require staff to propose fee‑schedule changes for future board action; they also reinforce the county’s push to find grant matches to reduce assessment amounts.
What’s next: Staff will bring a resolution and revised fee schedule language for board consideration, continue to pursue grant funding to lower homeowner costs, and provide outreach and documentation to affected neighborhoods.

