Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Construction Tempe topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tempeview construction moves forward; board reviews $500K–$965K options to update cafeteria exterior
Summary
As Tempeview construction proceeds, architects asked the board to authorize exterior work on the existing cafeteria façade; staff presented cost options ranging from staining to full veneer replacement and recommended a mid‑range replacement to match the new building.
Architects and construction staff updated the board on the next phase of the Tempeview renovation during the Feb. 11 study session and presented several options — with approximate costs — to update the exterior facade of the existing cafeteria adjacent to the new construction.
Nut graf: The district must decide whether to (a) leave the existing cafeteria facade largely as‑is, (b) stain/refresh the exterior, or (c) replace large sections of the brick veneer and architectural trim to better match the new addition. Staff showed cost estimates for multiple approaches and discussed tradeoffs of initial cost versus ongoing maintenance and community perception.
Options and costs presented: Staff presented a range of exterior options with consultant cost estimates: a stain/refresh option for about $515,000; partial replacement options in the $540,000–$580,000 range; and a full replacement/upgrade option approaching $965,000. The consultants recommended a mid‑range option (partial replacement of failing veneer and updated metal fascia) as the preferred balance of cost and visual cohesion with the new building.
Board discussion: Board members weighed the visual cohesion of the completed campus, recurring maintenance costs (staining expected every 7–10 years), and the fact the cafeteria area will be visible to students and staff even though it faces the interior of the campus rather than a public street. Some members said minimal work is acceptable; others said spending to harmonize the old and new facades would avoid a “sore thumb” effect after construction. Staff noted some prior exterior paint or chalk from events had left marks that did not pressure‑wash fully, which factored into replacement considerations.
Budget and procurement: Staff said the exterior work would be included in the Tempe construction budget and that the consultants’ estimates used conservative contractor pricing; they said actual bids could vary. Board members asked staff to confirm whether the work would require additional funds beyond current project contingencies and to return recommended language and cost options for cost‑control review.
Ending: Construction staff will return with a recommendation informed by updated cost estimates, confirmation of contingency funding, and a timeline for when exterior work would be undertaken relative to the remainder of the Tempe project.
