Bill would allow portable restrooms and portable hand-wash stations as alternative for ag tourism sites

Delegate D. Todd B. Morgan asked the Economic Matters Committee for a favorable report on House Bill 559, a proposal to create a more uniform and cost-effective set of options for agritourism operators to meet restroom and hand-washing requirements.

Morgan said some agritourism locations cannot feasibly install permanent restrooms because of topography, preservation requirements or cost and that costs for septic systems can range from "$200,000 to $300,000." He said portable chemical toilets with integrated hand-washing stations and weekly pumping can meet sanitation goals at a fraction of the cost and that inconsistent county-by-county rules are impeding small businesses.

"The bill will hopefully smooth out inconsistencies that exist between the counties and provide a clear framework for the small business owners moving forward to ensure patrons receive a quality experience without the establishment being unduly burdened by regulation," Morgan said.

Supporters and some committee members said the goal is to adopt a statewide standard for portable toilets and portable hand-washing stations that local health departments can apply consistently. Members asked whether portable solutions can meet current sanitation requirements; Morgan and other speakers said portable units can include pressurized-water hand-wash stations or use direct hookups to on-site wells and that many operators already use weekly pumping services.

Maryland Department of Health and Maryland Department of the Environment representatives raised concerns in submitted correspondence about pressurized water and environmental impacts; Morgan said he was working with agencies and stakeholders on amendments. No committee vote was recorded during the hearing.