Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Workforce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Missouri bill would expand health‑professional loan‑repayment eligibility to draw down more federal funds
Summary
A House committee heard testimony on House Bill 720, which would change state definitions in Missouri’s health professional loan‑repayment program to match federal guidelines, potentially enabling up to about $575,000 in additional federal funding and broadening which professions may qualify.
Representative Dane Deel (sponsor) introduced House Bill 720 to the House Committee on Health and Mental Health, saying the bill would align Missouri’s loan‑repayment definitions with federal guidelines to allow more health professions to qualify.
Ben Terrell, legislative liaison for the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, told the committee the change would let the state “pull down more federal dollars” by adding professions not currently enumerated in state statute. “This will increase that by up to $575,000,” Terrell said, describing the change as “making the pie bigger, not smaller.”
The department explained current state statute lists only doctors, dentists and chiropractors for the program, which limits the state’s ability to match and leverage federal funds. Testimony from the department and from the Missouri Hospital Association and other health organizations said workforce shortages among nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists and registered nurses make recruitment incentives important.
Committee members asked whether expanding eligibility would dilute awards for currently eligible professions or create more competition. Terrell said the program would become more competitive but argued the federal drawdown would more than double the amount the state could access. He and others noted the program prioritizes placements in federally defined underserved areas and that recipients currently must commit to at least two years of service in those locations.
Supporters including the Missouri Hospital Association, CoxHealth, the Associated Students of the University of Missouri, the Missouri Psychological Association and nurse and pharmacist groups testified they back the bill as a tool to recruit and retain health workers in underserved parts of the state.
Committee members requested clarifications the department agreed to provide, including the precise federal definitions of “underserved,” whether the two‑year service requirement is federal or state policy, the number of denied applicants under current funding caps, and whether statute should track the federal list (so future federal changes would automatically align). The department also said it will confirm whether existing state workforce programs can be counted as the required state match so the fiscal note would reflect federal rather than general‑revenue funding.
No formal action was taken on the bill during the hearing; the committee closed the HB 720 hearing and moved on to other items.
