Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prescott Council approves consent items and ordinances on Feb. 11; consent votes 6–0, select ordinances adopted
Summary
The Prescott City Council on Feb. 11 approved the consent agenda (items 7A–7C) and adopted two consent ordinances—an MOU for the Peavine Trail (Ordinance No. 2025‑1884) and a Land Development Code amendment for application completeness (Ordinance No. 2025‑1890)—by unanimous votes (6–0).
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Prescott City Council on Feb. 11 approved routine consent business and adopted two consent ordinances unanimously before taking up other agenda items. The council later adopted a separate ordinance on accessory dwelling unit submeters by a 5–1 vote (see separate article).
Key consent votes and ordinances
- Consent agenda items 7A–7C: Approved 6–0. The meeting record lists the consent agenda as adopted with no items pulled; the packet did not provide additional detail on each consent item during the public meeting record.
- Ordinance No. 2025‑1884: Adopted 6–0. Description in the packet: "An ordinance approving City Contract No. 2025‑136, a memorandum of understanding by and between the City and the Town of Chino Valley for the installation and maintenance of a portion of the Peavine Trail." (Adopted on consent.)
- Ordinance No. 2025‑1890: Adopted 6–0. Description in the packet: "An ordinance approving LDC 204‑3, a proposed amendment to the Land Development Code amending Section 9.1.5 application completeness for compliance with ARS 9‑462.11 and providing a severance provision." (Adopted on consent.)
Votes and procedure
Council made a motion and second to approve the consent agenda and the two consent ordinances; the City Clerk called the vote and the motions passed unanimously (6–0). Later in the meeting the council adopted Ordinance No. 2025‑1881 (ADU submeters) by vote 5–1 (covered in a separate article). The council recorded that Councilman Montoya was absent for the meeting.
The meeting minutes show no additional public testimony on the consent ordinance items during the meeting. Details for consent items 7A–7C were not read into the record during the meeting; the council packet contains the items and ordinance text referenced above.

