Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Workforce Dentistry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Idaho Dental Education Program requests one additional seat, seeks $54,000 to expand dental workforce
Summary
The Idaho Dental Education Program asked the committee for $54,000 ongoing to fund a single additional dental seat as part of a long‑term plan to grow Idaho’s dental workforce to 36 seats; program leaders said IDEP is oversubscribed and that most graduates return to practice in Idaho.
The Idaho Dental Education Program asked the Joint Finance‑Appropriations Committee for $54,000 in ongoing general fund support to add one dental training seat for FY2026, part of a long‑range plan to reach 36 total seats and expand Idaho’s dental workforce.
Kevin Campbell, a budget and policy analyst with the Legislative Services Office, told the committee IDEP students complete their first year of dental training at Idaho State University and finish at Creighton University School of Dentistry under a contractual arrangement; seats are reserved exclusively for Idaho residents and contract payments to Creighton are part of the program’s regular expenditures. Campbell said IDEP has 3.25 FTPs and no vacancies and that the program has been oversubscribed in recent years.
Jeff Weibargin, director of the Idaho Dental Education Program and an IDEP alumnus who also practices in Idaho Falls, told the committee the request for one additional seat is part of a multi‑year plan and that the program “sees no shortage whatsoever of highly qualified applicants.” He said applicants typically have high GPAs and DAT scores and that many otherwise‑qualified students are turned away each year because IDEP currently has limited capacity.
Weibargin and analysts told the committee that IDEP has historically delivered a strong return on investment for the state: between roughly 65% and 80% of graduates have ultimately returned to practice in Idaho, depending on the time period and whether graduates who pursue specialty training abroad are counted. Weibargin said the program’s recent multi‑year return rate was approximately 80% when measured over a longer window and that many students who initially leave for residencies or other programs subsequently return to Idaho.
Why it matters: Idaho has regional disparities in dental access, with some small and rural communities lacking enough dentists. Program leaders said that without affordable in‑state training options many Idaho students go elsewhere, incur larger debts and are less likely to return to practice in Idaho.
The committee heard no recorded vote during the presentation. Representatives and senators thanked program leaders for the overview and asked for follow‑up data; IDEP directors said the program would provide more detail as requested.
