Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Judiciary Committee: Key votes on penitentiary housing plan, protection-order access, guardianship and two concurrent resolutions
Summary
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted to advance several bills and two concurrent resolutions and to reject another, moving SB 2352, SB 2289, SB 2291 and two SCRs forward while voting a do-not-pass on SB 2326.
The Senate Judiciary Committee met in quorum and took votes on several bills and two concurrent resolutions, moving a handful of items forward and rejecting one restraining-order measure.
Committee members amended and recommended a due-pass for Senate Bill 2352 — the bill concerning a penitentiary-related housing plan — and referred it to the Appropriations Committee for consideration of related funding. The panel also approved an amended version of Senate Bill 2289 to expand law-enforcement access to protective-order records, and it voted a do-not-pass on Senate Bill 2326, the proposed changes to assault restraining-order language. Lawmakers recommended due-pass on Senate Bill 2291 (guardianship revisions) as amended. The committee approved two concurrent resolutions: SCR 4017, declaring certain explicit material a public-health hazard (due pass), and SCR 4018, urging planning for a memorial honoring volunteer and career emergency medical services personnel (due pass as amended).
Why it matters: the committee’s votes advance several measures to the full Senate or to further review. Referral to appropriations signals potential state spending tied to SB 2352; the guardianship and protective-order changes affect court practice and access to information; the concurrent resolutions reflect policy statements the Legislature may act upon.
Most important actions and outcomes
SB 2352 (penitentiary housing plan) — amendment adopted; due-pass as amended; re-referred to Appropriations - What happened: Senator Paulson introduced an amendment that (among other technical edits) limited coverage to persons age 18 or younger and struck the original section 1. The amendment was…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
