Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Preservation Strategy Demolition Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses proactive demolition review, inventories and $75,000 grant for underrepresented-neighborhood survey
Summary
Commissioners discussed ways to slow unreviewed demolitions by expanding local designation, creating a demolition notice registry or flagging older properties, and increasing staff capacity. Staff reported a $75,000 grant award for a National Register survey of Carver Park and Mobile Heights, but noted federal grant funding may be uncertain.
Commissioners discussed long-standing concerns about buildings being demolished without prior historic review and considered methods to identify and protect properties before they disappear. Staff and members proposed a mix of strategies, including targeted surveys, more local designations, a demolition-notice registry, and increased preservation staffing.
Commissioners said many properties that merit review are not locally designated, so they recommended systematic inventory work, targeted surveys of thematic areas and neighborhoods, and flagging demolition permit applications for structures older than a threshold age for staff review. Staff cautioned that a demolition-review requirement can create a large workload and possible legal challenges for the city’s preservation office if applied broadly; staff recommended a staged approach that focuses on high-priority properties.
A staff update reported the city applied for, and was awarded, $75,000 under an underrepresented-communities grant to fund a National Register survey and potential nomination for Carver Park and Mobile Heights neighborhoods. Staff cautioned that while the award has been made, federal-level grant administration decisions could affect the award’s realization. “We got the money, but we don't know what's gonna happen with it,” staff said.
Commissioners and staff discussed practical next steps: establishing a systematic survey cadence (for example, surveying a set number of properties or themes each year), assembling a working list of priority individual buildings and neighborhoods, and exploring whether the building department can supply weekly lists of demolition permit applications that can be filtered by age (for example, properties more than 75–80 years old). Staff said such a list could narrow the set of demolitions that require immediate review.
Several commissioners urged the commission to take the preservation case to city council so that protections and staff resources can be considered at the city level. Staff said designations require an ordinance adopted by council and that increased staffing would likely be necessary to manage any expanded demolition-review workload. Commissioners also discussed outreach and training opportunities: staff and partners plan a May seminar focused on neighborhood histories, architectural styles, and district guidelines to improve public understanding of preservation processes.
No ordinance changes or staffing commitments were authorized at the meeting; commissioners asked staff to draft a realistic proposal and options for discussion at a future meeting.
