Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tennessee Promise Mentor Program topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel approves making Promise mentor pilot permanent, allocates $7 million in general-fund request

2284451 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A subcommittee approved House Bill 148 to make permanent a Tennessee Promise mentor pilot that assigns coaches to students and provides up to $1,000 per student for emergency needs; sponsors said the program improved return rates and requested a $7 million general-fund appropriation.

A House higher education subcommittee approved House Bill 148 on Wednesday, a bill that would make permanent a pilot program within Tennessee Promise that assigns mentors to participating students and allows a coach to authorize up to $1,000 for emergency needs.

Chairman White, who presented the bill, described the pilot as a response to students who did not return for a second year because of short-term financial or life problems. "Each student will be assigned a mentor coach during their time, 4 years or 2 years in the program and that this spender coach then we would have up to $1,000 that the student can draw from," Chairman White said. He added the money would not be given directly to students; a coach would approve expenditures for emergency items, such as car repairs, that otherwise would keep a student from returning.

The sponsor said the pilot began in 2022 and that participation was associated with large improvements in returns for low-income students: "We have found out that the graduation rates for our low income students in Tennessee Promise has increased 6 times. It was about 6 percent of those returning. Now it's 6 times that," Chairman White said.

House Bill 148 requests a $7,000,000 appropriation from the general fund to support the program permanently; the sponsor said the fiscal review office previously misunderstood aspects of the fiscal note.

Committee members asked questions about the program and its funding; no roll-call of individual votes was printed in the transcript. The clerk reported the committee vote as "6 aye and 0 nays." The bill passed the subcommittee and will go to the full education committee for further consideration.