Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Curriculum Science topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wakefield committee backs multi-year shift to phenomena-based science curriculum
Summary
Wakefield Public Schools leaders described a multi-year plan to move middle- and high-school science instruction toward phenomena-driven units, field-tested options and teacher-designed materials; implementation will begin with at least one new unit next school year and a three-year rollout is expected.
Wakefield Public Schools officials on Feb. 11 outlined plans to shift 5th–12th grade science instruction toward a phenomena‑based model aligned to Massachusetts standards and the Next Generation Science Standards.
Joanne Marks, the district’s 5–12 science curriculum coordinator, told the School Committee the district began a multi-year review in 2023 and has field-tested multiple curricular options. "We started in spring of 2023. We had family surveys. We looked at a lot of data," Marks said, summarizing the work to date.
District staff said the change emphasizes students investigating real-world phenomena, using models and evidence, and integrating scientific practices with disciplinary content rather than teaching content in isolation. John Hanren, identified in the presentation as the Wakefield High School department coordinator for science, and Chris Gorski, the district’s middle-school curriculum liaison, described classroom pilots in both grade bands and the professional development that accompanied them.
Why it matters: the district said the approach better matches current state guidance and testing plans and aims to raise the level of student engagement and reasoning in science. Marks and the teachers said the change also aligns with upcoming shifts in state assessments: MCAS is piloting a more storyline- and practice-based assessment at grades 5 and 8 over the next two years.
What the district considered and decided: staff reviewed commercial curricula (OpenSciEd, Twig and others), used EdReports evaluations to narrow choices, and field-tested options. The Galvin Middle School team decided to move forward with teacher‑designed, phenomena‑based units (using open-source materials when useful) rather than adopt OpenSciEd or Twig. High‑school biology teachers are field‑testing and will decide by spring whether to adopt OpenSciEd units or the district’s teacher‑designed model for grade 9 biology.
Implementation timeline and costs: staff outlined a phased development plan with the goal of adding one to two new phenomena‑based units per year and reaching full implementation in about three years. The district estimated annual incremental costs mostly for professional development and teacher time in the range of roughly $10,000–$15,000, and said much material cost can be met from existing building instructional supply lines.
Assessment and equity: presenters said common performance assessments and rubrics will be developed alongside units so the district can measure student learning on both content and science practices. They also argued the phenomena approach creates multiple access points for English learners and students with disabilities by centering shared experiences, visuals and varied ways to represent understanding.
Next steps: the middle-school team will build and pilot units this spring for September implementation; the high‑school biology team will complete a second field test and make a decision about grade‑9 materials by late spring. District leaders said they will continue professional development and coordinate co‑teaching and special‑education supports as units roll out.
The committee did not take a formal vote on adoption at the meeting; staff framed the presentation as a plan and update and requested continued support for the time and PD needed to develop and implement units.
