Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regulatory Consolidation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel debates bill to move securities duties to insurance commissioner; no final vote taken
Summary
Senate Industry and Business Committee members debated a bill to have the insurance commissioner assume the duties of the securities commissioner but did not take final action; a "do pass" motion failed for lack of a second and a later "do not pass" motion was withdrawn before a vote.
Get email alerts on the Regulatory Consolidation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senators on the Senate Industry and Business Committee debated legislation to transfer the duties of the securities commissioner to the state insurance commissioner but took no final action at Wednesday’s meeting.
Chairman Barta introduced Senate Bill 2214 as a proposal that would have the insurance commissioner assume the duties of the securities commissioner. Ross Layton, chief of staff to the governor, told the panel the measure is not part of a specific merger bill currently in the Senate but could fit within broader administration efforts to seek efficiencies across state government. "It is not a part of the bill that was introduced in the senate to merge the departments, but it would be a part of the greater overall ... idea of merging departments and creating efficiencies across state government," Layton said.
John Arnold, deputy insurance commissioner, argued consolidating regulatory authority could yield industry and government efficiencies. "I would think that from those that we regulate, it would also increase some efficiencies from their, perspective as well," Arnold said, noting overlap in regulation of annuities and other wealth-management products.
Opponents on the committee raised concerns about workload, the differences between state insurance regulation and federal regulation in securities and potential loss of institutional expertise. Senator Klein said he would not support the bill and cited the securities department’s performance and the absence of clear cost savings. "I don't know that we need to rock that boat. Maybe someday, maybe, but not now," Klein said. Other senators echoed concerns that combining the offices would not deliver measurable cost savings and could dilute the focus of staff who now specialize in insurance or securities.
The committee recorded two formal motions during discussion. Senator Kessel moved a "do pass" recommendation on the bill; that motion failed for lack of a second. Later, Senator Klonick moved a "do not pass" recommendation but withdrew the motion before any roll call vote.
Committee members expressed divergent views: Senator Angus said he favored combining the two offices if the merged office had appropriate staff to cover both regulatory areas; Senator Kessel and others warned that the insurance department already is managing a substantial workload and that the proposal could create operational strain.
The committee did not take action to advance or defeat the bill. Members said they would allow additional time for discussion and stakeholder engagement and expected to revisit the proposal at a later meeting.
