Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Contracts And Zoning Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Berkeley County committees approve contracts, software renewals and a slate of zoning bills; multiple motions carried by voice vote
Summary
Administrative and land‑use committee meetings approved contract renewals for Ferguson Waterworks and Central Square software, a $10,000 Keep Berkeley Beautiful grant, and multiple zoning bills. Most actions were approved by voice vote; details of roll‑call tallies were not recorded in the transcript.
Berkeley County Council committees voted to approve contract renewals, accept a small grant and advance a series of zoning and development bills during routine committee meetings.
Administrative Services approved a Ferguson Waterworks maintenance renewal for county meter hardware and software and a Central Square enterprise software renewal for finance and HR systems. Both items were described as budgeted in the current fiscal year; the Ferguson renewal was presented at $123,928.05 with $125,000 budgeted for the line item, and the Central Square renewal was presented at $132,607.25 with an available budget of a little over $145,000. Both motions carried by voice vote.
The committee also voted to accept a $10,000 Palmetto Pride/Keep Berkeley Beautiful grant. The presenter said there was no local match requirement; the motion passed by voice vote.
At a separate meeting, the Committee on Land Use approved a series of zoning and development bills prior to first, second and third readings. The transcript records motions and approvals for the following items (descriptions not specified in the record): bills 25-08, 25-09, 25-10, 25-11, 25-12, 25-01 (zoning modification for 843 Construction Design and Development LLC covering TMS numbers not specified), 23-25-003, 25-04, and a grouped set of third readings (24-72, 24-704, 24-806, 24-807). Committee members combined third readings and approved the listed bills by voice vote.
Most motions in these committee sessions were approved by voice vote; the transcript records aye/aye and “motion carries” language but does not provide roll‑call vote counts for these items.
