Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Credit Projects topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public hearing held for 145‑unit Rohrer LIHTC project at Urban Farm site; no commission action required

2270034 · February 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission opened a statutorily required public hearing on Rohrer’s proposed 145‑unit Low Income Housing Tax Credit project at 8553 Huffine Lane; the project would seek 4% tax credits and 30‑year deed restrictions and is not located in a qualified census tract.

The commission held a required public hearing on a Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) project proposed for the Urban Farm site at 8553 Huffine Lane. The hearing was informational only; no commission action was required.

Renata Monfreda, community housing program coordinator for the city, explained the statutory purpose of the hearing: the Montana Board of Housing requires local notice and an opportunity for public comment when a proposed project seeks a property‑tax exemption as part of a LIHTC application. The developer and partner (Rohrer in partnership with HRDC) are pursuing 4% tax credits. Staff described the proposal as 145 income‑ and rent‑restricted units targeted to households at 60% or less of area median income, with deed restriction for no less than 30 years. The project’s parcel is at 8553 Huffine Lane and, staff noted, the site is not in a qualified census tract (QCT), so the developer is pursuing 4% credits rather than the more competitive 9% program.

Conceptual renderings shown to commissioners depicted multi‑building development with leasing and community space, fitness room, playground, a dog park and outdoor amenities. Monfreda said no public comments were submitted to city staff before the hearing. As this is a jurisdictional requirement tied to the state tax‑exemption/LIHTC process, the commission’s role was limited to receiving public comment and documenting the hearing record for the developer’s Montana Board of Housing application; the hearing did not grant site approvals or entitlements.

No public commenters registered before the city closed the hearing; staff said the matter will continue through the Montana Housing application process.