Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council authorizes RFP for architectural services to update Civic Campus cost estimates and feasibility options
Summary
Roseville authorized a request for proposals for architectural services to update cost estimates for the licensed passport/dance center and maintenance operations center, evaluate feasibility of single‑story and adaptive‑reuse options, and provide layouts and presentations; council added direction to include phasing and parking considerations.
The Roseville City Council unanimously authorized release of a draft request for proposals (RFP) seeking architectural services to refine cost estimates and feasibility for Civic Campus projects, including the licensed passport/dance center and the maintenance operations center.
Public Works Director Jesse Fryhammer summarized a two‑phase scope: Phase 1 would update 2022 cost estimates for the license/passport center and maintenance operations center, identify feasibility to reuse portions of the existing maintenance buildings, and produce layouts and a council presentation; Phase 2 (authorized later if needed) would require the consultant to bring two alternative design options intended to reduce cost relative to the existing Civic Campus Master Plan. Fryhammer noted the RFP currently omits formal public engagement but council could request it and that parking and phasing would be included in the study per council direction.
Staff proposed a short solicitation schedule with proposals due March 3 and a planned presentation to council on May 19. Council members asked about estimated consultant fees (staff gave a rough ballpark of about $50,000 as an informal estimate), parking considerations, phasing checkpoints and the option to stop or pivot if a structural hazard is discovered in the existing building. Public comment requested inclusion of recreational uses and a rental‑space cost comparison as potential alternatives; staff said the RFP focuses the scope but would consider community input in subsequent phases.
Councilor Graff moved to authorize the RFP with council input; Councilor Bauer seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Staff will release the RFP and return results to council per the proposed schedule.
