Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning Lennar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hialeah approves Lennar rezoning in Hialeah Heights with covenant tying occupancy to roadway progress
Summary
The City Council approved a rezoning and variance to allow a 78-unit Lennar for-sale neighborhood in the Hialeah Heights annex, adding a covenant that ties temporary certificates of occupancy to substantial completion of the A‑107 roadway connection; council directed staff to revisit the condition within a year.
The City of Hialeah City Council voted to approve a rezoning and related variances for a Lennar Homes development in the Hialeah Heights annex, adding a city-drafted covenant that restricts temporary certificates of occupancy until the A‑107 roadway connection is substantially completed.
The council's action, taken on second reading for the rezoning (Item 8), followed public comment from nearby residents and a presentation by the applicant's attorney. Hugo Arza, representing the property owner and Lennar, described the project schedule and cleanup requirements, saying the environmental remediation process “will take every bit of 9 to 12 months” before construction starts and that the developer expects the first move‑ins in mid‑2026. He said Lennar will “be there, you know, every step of the way” to work with the city and neighbors.
Why it matters: neighbors told the council the annex already faces congestion, heavy truck traffic and limited emergency‑service infrastructure; council members said they wanted safeguards so early occupancy does not outpace planned county road improvements. Carlos Narvaez, a resident who said he represents neighbors in the Annex, told the council, “we have a huge concern with the development, especially with the traffic.”
Council discussion focused on timing and enforceability. Planning staff and the applicant agreed to add a recorded covenant requiring that the roadway connection to A‑107 be “substantially completed” before issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy; the council agreed the covenant language would also allow the council to revisit the restriction in one year. The planning director noted the city can also require additional traffic mitigation during the site plan and concurrency review.
The council approved the rezoning and variance as amended. Councilmember Dunidor moved the motion and it carried on roll call; the approval includes the covenant and a requirement that staff provide updates so the council can reconsider the occupancy condition if circumstances change.
The developer and city officials said the project will be built in phases and sales would proceed over multiple years, which council members said reduces the chance that the entire community would occupy while county roadway work remains incomplete. The applicant offered to continue meeting with residents and county commissioners to coordinate timing of the county roadway project.
The council's approval does not change the requirement that the developer complete county and state permits (including contamination remediation and county roadway work) before final site plan and construction. Council members said they expect follow‑up reports to the planning director and the council as the project moves forward.
