Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves SB8 fee tweaks, multiple funding requests and new line items

2261067 · February 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A joint House–Senate committee unanimously approved fee adjustments to be proposed in Senate Bill 8, authorized federal and one‑time state funding requests, created new budget line items and approved several internal reallocations and ongoing funding priorities during a committee meeting.

The committee approved a set of fee changes to be proposed in Senate Bill 8 and a series of funding motions and administrative budget actions during a joint House–Senate committee meeting. The committee also approved federal funds requests, legislative intent language, one‑time and prioritized ongoing funding tables, and several internal line‑item changes.

The committee voted unanimously to send fee changes to Senate Bill 8 after a motion to adjust several line items by $1 per unit. Senator Vickers moved the fee changes and explained they were intended as a modest adjustment this year with a footnote signaling a possible larger reduction next year. "What we're doing here is basically just sending a...future message," Vickers said during debate. The chair noted the committee had discussed election office concerns and the lieutenant governor's office had suggested some fees were higher than needed.

Why this matters: The fee changes will be carried forward in SB8 and, according to members, are intended both to reduce particular administrative fees slightly this year and to preserve the committee's ability to pursue larger reductions in the next session. The session also allocated one‑time funds to agencies and created and relocated internal line items that will affect budget execution and internal service fund accounting.

Key actions and context

- SB8 fee adjustments: The committee approved placing fee and internal service fund (ISF) rate language into Senate Bill 8 with specific line adjustments (see clarifying details). Senator Vickers moved the item; the motion passed with the committee ruling it passed in both the House and the Senate.

- Minutes: Representative Malloy moved to approve the minutes from the February meeting; the motion passed unanimously.

- Federal funds request: Representative Shepherd moved to approve the federal funds request listed as item 2 in the voting packet; the committee approved it unanimously.

- Legislative intent language: The committee approved the legislative intent language listed in the voting packet (item 3) and added the tax administration intent language that had been circulated in committee. The chair said the language had been approved in prior interim committees and was being inherited by this group.

- Reallocations (item 4): Representative Dominguez moved to approve the items listed under item 4 (reallocations), reported as totaling $0; the motion passed unanimously.

- Other motions (item 5): The committee created a new line item for the Department of Government Operations called "Enterprise Business Solutions" and approved a motion to relocate the Human Resource Management paid‑for‑performance HACAA program to the DHRM Internal Service Fund line item; both motions were adopted unanimously.

- Requests from non‑state funds (item 6): The committee approved spending requests from non‑state funds (dedicated credits, federal funds, restricted accounts) as presented, noting these are existing funds the agencies requested permission to spend.

- One‑time state funding (item 7): The committee approved the item 7 table of one‑time state funding requests (internally funded). The Insurance Department presentation was highlighted: members were told the department faces an estimated $41–$42 million shortfall over the next four years tied to mandated insurer payment adjustments, and the committee proposed an initial package of $2,200,000 to cover immediate needs plus an additional $4,400,000 to help address future pressure; members noted this would not solve the longer‑term deficit.

- Ongoing funding (items 8a and 8b): The committee approved two separate motions: (a) the modest set of ongoing items that could be internally funded (8a), and (b) a prioritized list of ongoing state funding requests (8b) that the committee recommended for further consideration by executive appropriations because committee internal funding was insufficient to cover them.

- Adjournment: Representative Stoddard moved to adjourn; the motion carried after recorded no votes from a small number of members, and the chair declared the meeting adjourned.

Discussion vs. decisions

Several items were discussed at greater length: the SB8 fee adjustments (members debated whether to make a larger cut now versus a smaller cut plus a footnote indicating future review) and the Insurance Department funding request (members were warned of a multi‑year shortfall and the limits of one‑time funding). Numerous motions were procedural or bookkeeping in nature and passed with little or no debate. Where debate was recorded, the article notes those comments; formal actions, motions and outcomes are listed above.

Ending

The committee concluded by approving the packet of administrative and funding motions on the agenda and adjourning. Several items (including the prioritized ongoing funding requests) were described as recommendations for executive appropriations consideration or as footnoted policy signals to be revisited next year.