Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
OMB presents six-month expenditure-control report; items over 75% flagged for council review
Summary
Office of Management & Budget presented the semiannual expenditure-control report required by city code §2-3-61. Several departmental line items exceeded the 75% threshold, primarily due to timing and annual contracts; OMB said total salary-and-wages levels remain within budget and transfers or attrition savings will cover temporary overages.
Get email alerts on the Budget Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wilmington — City budget staff presented the semiannual expenditure-control report to the Finance and Economic Development Committee and flagged accounts that had reached 75% or more of their budget at midyear.
Robert Greco, budget director, and CJ Jones, budget analyst in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), told the committee that the report covers fiscal-year-to-date actuals through six months and identifies account lines at or above 75% so departments and council can review. CJ Jones summarized the flagged lines and cause: council overtime showed a $300 overage (no overtime was budgeted for council), the law department had a temporary-salaries overage of $928 covered by attrition savings, finance had collection-expense payments for an annual collections contract, and police consultants were at roughly 79.8% of budget because of annual consultant contracts for camera-watch personnel and youth/family clinical services.
Jones concluded, "And that concludes my presentation. Thank you." The OMB presenters and committee members explained that many overages are timing issues: some contracts are paid upfront and the related line shows high percent-used at midyear even though the department's salary-and-wage character level is within overall budget. Greco said departments can move budget amounts between account lines within a character level and OMB is processing transfers where appropriate.
Council members asked for more context in future reports. Council Member Spadola requested clearer explanation of the ordinance requirement that triggers the midyear report and a reminder that the fiscal year begins July 1. Greco said the city runs weekly expenditure-review reports and that any department can be added for closer review; he also noted the report was created after prior administration problems with overtime tracking.
Why it matters: The midyear expenditure-control review is a transparency tool required by city code to highlight potential budget pressure points early in the fiscal year so council and the public can question or request adjustments before year-end.
Committee outcome: The report was presented for committee information; no formal council action or vote was taken on the report itself. OMB agreed to provide additional context and to furnish requested detail to council members about specific accounts and receivable breakdowns on follow-up requests.

