Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
SJC hears dispute over whether Uniform Anatomical Gift Act shields Harvard from morgue misconduct claims
Summary
At oral argument in Weiss v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, attorneys debated whether the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) bars claims against Harvard for alleged misconduct by a morgue manager and whether alleged bad faith by the employee can be imputed to the institution.
Jeffrey Catalano, attorney for the plaintiffs, told the Supreme Judicial Court during oral argument that the trial court’s dismissal should be reversed because the plaintiffs were denied discovery and because the UAGA “is silent with regard to anything related to what happens in the morgue.”
Catalano told the justices the complaints allege persistent, repeated misconduct by a Harvard employee, morgue manager Cedric Lodge, over about five years and that the plaintiffs should be allowed to develop facts in discovery that plausibly show institutional accountability. He argued the UAGA governs the donative or transactional aspects of anatomical gifts, not the handling, storage, labeling or security of remains, and that if the statute did apply the admitted bad faith of the morgue manager would be imputed to Harvard under UAGA principles and the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

