Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections Candidate Eligibility topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee discusses H.117 to bar primary losers from running general-election ballots

2259508 · February 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Government Operations & Military Affairs Committee discussed H.117, which would prevent a candidate who ran in a major-party primary and lost from appearing on the general-election ballot as an independent or under another party. The committee flagged the bill for further consideration; no vote was taken.

The Government Operations & Military Affairs Committee discussed H.117, a bill that would prevent a candidate who ran in a major-party primary and lost from appearing on the general-election ballot as an independent or as a candidate for another party, during a committee meeting (date not specified).

Representative Hoover, who presented the measure to the committee, said the bill aims to close what the presenter called a loophole that emerged after earlier changes to election law. "That seems to me to be, two bites of the same apple, which I don't think the legislature or democratic process probably endorses," Hoover said. "This bill basically says, if you've run as a major party candidate in a primary, then you're not eligible to run in the general as an independent or from another party. That simple."

The presenter described a recent election in which a candidate lost a primary in one party and was later designated by a different party to run in the general election. The presenter said the situation appeared unintended when the legislature reworked election law and that H.117 would draw a clearer line between primary participation and general-election eligibility. "I don't think it matters if you filed here or you filed there," the presenter said, emphasizing the proposal targets the candidate's participation in a major-party primary rather than party administrative actions.

Committee members asked clarifying questions. A committee member identified as Nate asked for a hypothetical scenario to illustrate how the bill would operate: "If you could give, like, without giving any names, obviously, but candidate X, candidate Y scenario so I can picture it." The presenter confirmed the scenario described matched the case that prompted the bill.

Committee leadership said the bill will be considered as the committee develops a broader elections package. The committee chair thanked the presenter and said the H.117 discussion would be folded into the larger elections bill under development, noting additional work and potential costs: "Now thank you for bringing that to the committee representative, and we'll definitely have chats on that as we build out that elections bill. And it's gonna be a very, very expensive bill."

No formal motion or vote on H.117 was taken during the meeting. Committee members flagged the proposal for further consideration and discussion as part of a wider elections bill; no timeline or formal referral was recorded in the transcript.

The transcript also shows the committee planned a brief recess and later indicated that other bills with overlapping jurisdiction would make a separate appearance for informational purposes to the committee (a "drive-by" briefing), including an item currently in the House Judiciary Committee.