Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Council awards Arrow Building tenant‑improvement contract; council discusses local preference and funding language

January 25, 2025 | Palmdale City, Los Angeles County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Every Government Meeting

Get lifetime access to government meeting videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council awards Arrow Building tenant‑improvement contract; council discusses local preference and funding language
The City Council unanimously approved agreement A‑9192 with Nash Construction Services Inc. for the Arrow Building tenant improvement project (project 907) with a contract amount not to exceed $280,921, which includes a 15% contingency, Public Works Director Lee Torres told the council.

Torres said the Arrow Building space at 38255 Ninth Street East will be renovated to provide a break room, restrooms, storage and office space for public safety staff. The project went to bid on Nov. 28; the city received three bids, including one from a Palmdale‑based contractor. Nash Construction was the lowest responsible bidder, with a base construction amount of $244,279. Torres said the funds for the project are budgeted and available in fiscal year 2024‑25 under Measure AV.

Councilmember Andrea asked how the city weighs local bidders in the public‑bid process; Torres said local preference is encouraged but, under public bidding rules, the award is made to the lowest responsible bidder. The council asked whether a points‑based local preference could be added to future procurements. The city attorney replied that the city’s charter and home‑rule powers allow flexibility for local preference on certain public works contracts and that staff and the attorney’s office could examine options to give more weight to local bidders where legally permissible.

Councilmember Andrea also asked why the contract's exhibit included ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) language when the staff report stated funding comes from Measure AV. The city attorney said the ARPA provisions had been included in standard contract language as a catchall in case funding sources change or ARPA dollars become available; those federal requirements would apply only if ARPA funds were used.

The council moved and seconded the item and adopted the agreement by unanimous vote.

Ending: Staff said the project will proceed with Nash Construction; the council directed staff to consult with the city attorney about possible local‑preference mechanisms for future procurements and to report back.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal