Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administrative Law Judges report fast resolutions of Fair Campaign complaints and urge local candidate training
Summary
The Office of Administrative Hearings told the House Elections Committee that its fair-campaign docket resolved many complaints quickly—often before election day—and recommended upstream training for local candidates and treasurers to reduce inadvertent violations under chapters 211A and 211B.
The Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) told the House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee that its fair-campaign docket resolved many campaign complaints promptly and recommended stepped-up training for local candidates to reduce inadvertent violations of campaign law.
The OAH presentation matters because the office’s process is designed to avoid last-minute “gotcha” complaints and to resolve disputes quickly so voters have factual information before ballots are cast. Administrative Law Judge Eric Lippman said the 2004 legislative reforms that created the OAH process were designed to prevent frivolous complaints from being used as a campaign tactic.
Jenny Starr, OAH Chief Administrative Law Judge, and Administrative Law Judge Eric Lippman presented statistics and described OAH’s “three-layer” review process: an initial prima facie screen to dismiss claims that lack legal basis, a probable-cause step that allows the targeted campaign to respond, and a fuller evidentiary review by a panel of judges when needed. Lippman said the office resolved roughly half or more of election-related complaints before election day in the cycles reviewed and that even complex matters were decided within about 60 days on average.
Lippman said the majority of filings involve local campaigns (mayor, city council, school boards and other local units) rather than state candidates and observed that under-resourced local campaigns are more likely to run afoul of technical campaign rules. “We have the lightest touch possible on candidates and campaigns,” Lippman said, explaining that many complaints are dismissed quickly to avoid burdening candidates’ First Amendment rights and to reduce unnecessary litigation. He recommended “upstream” training—targeted guidance for local candidates, treasurers and small campaigns—so they can observe disclosure, disclaimer and filing rules and avoid court involvement.
Starr and Lippman described case volumes across recent cycles and stressed that the OAH docket provides a timely, administratively focused forum to address campaign disputes. They suggested potential partners for training include municipal associations and other groups that advise local office-seekers.
