Residents urge county help over proposed Thompson Station outlet mall; commissioners say municipal authority limits options
Loading...
Summary
Three residents told commissioners Feb. 10 they oppose a proposed outlet mall near Thompson's Station, citing infrastructure, crime concerns and lack of municipal services; county staff said the development lies inside Thompson’s Station corporate limits and the county has limited authority.
Residents concerned about a proposed luxury outlet mall near Thompson’s Station asked Williamson County commissioners on Feb. 10 to help block or limit the project, saying the area lacks infrastructure and could be a public-safety burden on the county’s unincorporated residents.
Jane Sadler, who said she lives within three miles of the proposed site on Highway 431, said the announcement “made me cry” and that she fears traffic, crime and insufficient infrastructure. “I cried out of fear for the potential destruction coming to our beautiful area,” Sadler said during citizens communications.
Commissioner Judy Herbert asked whether the county has authority to slow or stop the project. County counsel responded that the mall site lies inside the town’s corporate limits and urban growth boundary and that “we have very little say in what can be done within those corporate limits. They've got home rule and we have very little say in that.”
Several commissioners asked staff to look for options, including whether state-level review or existing bills would provide additional oversight. Commissioner Mary Smith referenced House Bill 365 (filed in the General Assembly) as a possible tool that could increase intergovernmental oversight of projects that impact county residents; staff said they would circulate the bill and research whether state review applies. Commissioner Paul Hayes and others said they were receiving many constituent complaints and asked county staff to explore legal or intergovernmental avenues.
County staff said the municipality typically provides police and fire within its corporate limits; the county retains an obligation to provide services where municipal coverage is not provided, and that may lead to expense for the county even if municipal revenue accrues to the town.
Ending: County staff agreed to investigate state-level authorities, the status of municipal approvals for the mall, and whether county support or intergovernmental action is feasible; no formal vote or new policy was taken.
