Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Censure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norwin School Board adopts censure resolution after public petition over board member’s online posts
Summary
The Norwin School District board voted to adopt Resolution No. 2025-2, a formal censure of a sitting board member following public comment, a petition of more than 600 signatures and legal counseladexplanation of the board's authority to condemn speech.
The Norwin School District Board of Education voted to adopt Resolution No. 2025-2, a formal censure of a sitting board member, after multiple public speakers presented a petition and read excerpts from the board member's online posts.
The action came after Anna Whitaker, introduced to the board as a community member, said she presented a petition signed by more than 600 people asking the board to “take immediate and appropriate action” against the board member, including "formal censure, public condemnation of remarks, or other measures." Whitaker read excerpts from the board member's blog and told the board the language included a call to “build cages for these feral animals,” referring to immigrants, and other language she said was “divisive” and harmful to students and staff.
The censure motion was discussed in public session. Board legal counsel explained the difference between “censor” and “censure,” saying the board may adopt an official expression of disapproval. Counsel advised that "the board is free to do that as a public entity without violating any rights," noting school boards have limited but permissible options for public condemnation.
During public comment Brooke Brownie urged the board to hold members to standards at least as high as those applied to students, and suggested requiring background clearances for future board candidates. A graduate who spoke said the board member's remarks “do not display our community's values” and urged the board to forward the petition for action.
On the roll call for Resolution No. 2025-2 the board recorded seven votes in favor and one abstention; the resolution passed. The roll-call record in the public meeting named board members who voted yes; one board member abstained (the transcript does not clearly tie the abstention to a specific named roll-call entry). The board president announced, "Resolution passes."
Board President Bill Bogella opened the meeting and acknowledged the volume of public comment on the agenda item before the roll call. The full text of Resolution No. 2025-2 was posted on the board agenda packet, and counsel noted the district had previously faced similar motions: this was described as the third time in five years the board had considered a censure motion.
The board did not take additional disciplinary action against the member during the meeting beyond the adopted censure resolution. Several speakers asked the board to pursue measures beyond censure; the board took no further formal actions during the session.
The board clerk's agenda lists the full resolution text; the meeting record indicates the board intends to make the resolution part of the public record.
