Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Homelessness Shelter Code Blue topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears update on Code Blue, volunteers and state plans for a permanent shelter

2256780 · February 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Salt Lake City council members were briefed on the city and state's winter emergency shelter response during public comment and a follow‑up staff update, including how the Code Blue statute works, the shortage of volunteers to run emergency sites and ongoing talks about a permanent shelter site.

Salt Lake City council members were briefed on the city and state's winter emergency shelter response during public comment and a follow‑up staff update, including how the Code Blue statute works, the shortage of volunteers to run emergency sites and ongoing talks about a permanent shelter site.

The update explained that Code Blue is a statewide statute that “kicks in at 18 degrees Fahrenheit. That includes wind chill,” and that the measure is intended as “a really last‑ditch emergency option for the really worst nights for a small number of people,” not as the primary winter shelter capacity.

Why it matters: volunteers and the statutory temperature threshold affect whether emergency Code Blue sites can open on any given night. Staff told the council the combination of lower day‑to‑day base bed capacity and variable volunteer availability has increased reliance on Code Blue, creating nights when current capacities are insufficient to serve everyone in need.

Staff said the city and state continue daily coordination on both interim and long‑term solutions. “The state is still actively seeking land for a permanent shelter,” the staff update said, describing the site the state is considering as a “very large campus” potentially sized to serve roughly 1,200 people. Because a permanent campus could take time to identify and build, staff also said they are working on an interim plan the partners hope to put in place within 12 to 24 months, but that no formal announcement was yet ready.

Council member Sarah Young thanked staff for the update and pressed for what can be shared with the public about next steps. Young also recounted feedback from people experiencing homelessness who said they dread the transition season when Code Blue sites can close even as winter weather improves, underscoring tensions between statutory thresholds and lived experience.

Staff described the city’s winter overflow system and how the unavailability of some base beds 24/7 has increased demand for Code Blue beds on certain nights: “Instead of having 900 of those day in, day out, 24/7 beds, you may have 600. And then you have to rely on… instead of 50 Code Blue beds, you need to rely on 250 Code Blue beds to get enough.”

The update included a procedural note about volunteer dependence: volunteers are required to operate Code Blue sites; staff said they had volunteers for only one of the two sites needed at present and were asking the council and public to help recruit more volunteers.

Council members asked about timing and next public announcements; staff said they would announce details as soon as feasible and continue frequent coordination with the state Office of Homeless Services. No formal action or vote on new policy was taken at the briefing.

The council requested continued briefings so it can share accurate status updates with constituents as discussions advance.