Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Syracuse board hears governor's education budget proposal; district projects small state-aid uptick
Summary
District staff reviewed elements of the governor's executive budget, changes to Foundation Aid, projections for excess-cost and building aid, and a preliminary tax-levy calculation ahead of the budget season.
Get email alerts on the Education Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Don Keegan presented a preliminary review of the governor's executive budget proposal and its likely impact on the North Syracuse Central School District, focusing on Foundation Aid, expense-driven aids and draft tax-levy calculations.
Keegan said the governor proposed updates to how Foundation Aid measures poverty and local wealth by using Census small-area poverty estimates and updated indicators for low-income students. He characterized the governor's proposal as including a "hold-harmless" provision guaranteeing at least a 2% increase for districts and said the proposal as drafted would raise the district's state aid by roughly 1.8% to 2% before building aid adjustments.
Nut Graf: The presentation detailed where the district expects state aid increases and where uncertainty remains: building aid and final excess-cost reimbursements could materially change the district's available revenue; the board and staff will continue refining estimates as the state budget process proceeds through March.
Keegan described several line items and local updates. He said an initial governor's number for excess-cost public aid was about $3.1 million, but district staffers who process the required state forms concluded a more representative number is about $5 million because of processing lags. Keegan also noted building aid will increase when the district files additional final cost reports, and those increases account for much of the governor's proposed uptick in aid.
On universal prekindergarten (UPK), Keegan said the district's total allocation is about $2,400,000 but the district expects to collect roughly $2,100,000 in UPK aid based on projected enrollment. "The actual amount of our allocation is about $2,400,000 but we only get a certain amount of aid per pupil and, based on our projections for how many students will be enrolled in our UPK program, we're only gonna collect about $2,100,000 of UPK aid," Keegan said.
Keegan walked the board through the statutory tax-levy calculation and said the district's preliminary tax-levy figure would be about a $3.2 million increase, or roughly 3.8 percent; he described that number as preliminary and subject to change when pilot agreements (including any pilot for Micron) are finalized. "If the pilot agreements increase dramatically, our tax levy will go down," Keegan said, explaining that tax payments-in-lieu-of-taxes are excluded from the levy calculation.
He also briefed the board on other budget pressures and assumptions, including inflation, contract negotiations and the expiration of federal stimulus funds. Keegan said district staff received encouraging but preliminary health-benefit projections suggesting health costs might rise about 4% next year, versus double-digit increases in recent years. He closed by outlining the district budget timeline: an initial budget presentation in about a month, a budget hearing on May 13, an April 21 board adoption target, and a public vote on May 20.
Ending: The board asked follow-up questions about excess-cost processing, BOCES placements and available seats; Keegan said staff will provide further detail as the budget process continues.

