Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Liquor License Expansion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors object to Moose Lodge request to extend liquor service outdoors; council explains process
Summary
Neighbors on Sacramento Street told the council they oppose a Moose Lodge request to expand alcohol service outdoors, saying existing noise and disruptive behavior already interferes with nearby backyards.
Get email alerts on the Liquor License Expansion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors on Sacramento Street told the Auburn City Council they oppose a request by Moose Lodge No. 2246 to extend liquor service to an outdoor patio that sits about 15 feet from several houses.
The residents said loud conversation, swearing, gambling and fights on the Lodge’s second‑floor deck already interfere with peaceful use of nearby yards and that an expanded outdoor bar would increase those problems. “Just allowing a bar environment and drinking outside will raise noise levels for ourselves and our neighborhood,” Michael Bella told the council, saying he and his tenants have made multiple calls to the Auburn Police Department and have been sworn at when asking patrons to quiet down.
The council did not vote on the license. City staff explained the process and limits of local authority: the state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) issues licenses, and the Lodge already holds an indoor license, but the proposed outdoor extension would expand a preexisting nonconforming use in the zoning district. “If they are intending to extend their liquor license from what they already have, they would be expanding the nonconforming use, which isn't allowed under our zoning code unless the planning commission approves it,” a city staff member said during public comment.
Staff described the likely sequence: ABC reviews the license application; if ABC grants an outdoor extension, the city’s planning commission would then consider whether an expansion of the nonconforming use can be permitted. The planning commission decision would be subject to appeal to the council if appealed. Staff also said ABC has received copies of neighborhood complaints and that the planning commission hearing would be a public hearing with mailed notice to nearby property owners.
Neighbors said their concerns include the patio’s proximity (about 15 feet) to back yards, amplified noise from the deck’s roof overhang, late‑night hours, and incidents of intimidation and threats. Chase Morgan, a nearby resident, said the Lodge’s behavior “is consistent with that of a rowdy dive bar” and urged the council and staff to ensure the planning process reflects neighbors’ safety and quality‑of‑life concerns.
City staff asked residents to monitor follow‑up communications and attend the planning commission hearing if the matter is scheduled. They also said staff will compile the call log and complaint history to provide to council and the planning commission.
Ending: The council did not take action at the meeting; the city advised that if ABC grants an outdoor license extension, the planning commission would hear the request and nearby property owners would receive notice and have the opportunity to comment at public hearings.

