Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Investments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Budget committee recommends short-duration UBS advisory solution for city portfolio, warns of short-term realized losses

2253566 · January 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee recommended the City Council consider hiring UBS to manage Clayton’s investment portfolio using a short-duration Treasury strategy; staff said a full transition of the roughly $12 million portfolio would realize about $126,000 in paper losses but could be recouped by higher yield within about a year.

The Clayton City Budget and Audit Committee on Jan. 13 recommended that the City Council consider engaging UBS’s advisory program and, subject to Council approval, pursue a short-duration U.S. Treasury portfolio for the city’s invested reserves. Committee members said the short-duration strategy is the most conservative option presented and noted the trade-off between taking short-term realized losses and capturing current higher yields.

James Dill, a UBS representative, presented two advisory solutions: a short-duration Treasury portfolio (average duration about one year, maximum maturity three years, current yield cited at about 4.28 percent) and a broader investment-grade government and credit short-term portfolio (average duration about 2.5 years, maximum maturity about seven years) run by other managers including Invesco. Dill said the city’s current invested holdings are valued at a little over $12,000,000 and that a full transition to a new advisory portfolio would realize about $126,000 of losses because some current holdings are trading below their purchase price. Dill told the committee those realized losses could be recouped by higher yields in under 12 months in the current rate environment.

Dill described additional potential benefits of a managed advisory relationship: institutional execution, continuous portfolio management to limit idle cash, monthly reporting, and access to multiple portfolio managers through UBS’s Access platform. He said advisory fees would be 30 basis points (0.30 percent) annually, billed quarterly and calculated on the daily average balance; at a $12 million portfolio that equates to roughly $36,000 per year in advisory fees. Committee members asked why the fee proposal is 30 basis points (up from an earlier 20 bips discussion); Dill said the larger access model and use of multiple external portfolio managers and related due diligence account for the higher fee.

Committee discussion favored the short-duration Treasury option as the most conservative strategy that fits the city’s liquidity needs. One committee member recommended a full conversion to the short-duration Treasury portfolio, accepting the near-term realized losses in exchange for higher expected income and better liquidity. Members discussed accounting treatment and confirmed portfolio market values are reflected in financial reporting; the committee noted the city’s other reserve accounts (camp and leave funds) remain available for emergencies.

A public commenter supporting UBS said the arrangement replaces a suitability-based brokerage relationship with a fiduciary duty model and praised the institutional, commission-free structure. Committee members asked staff to present the UBS option to the City Council; staff said the committee’s recommendation will be taken to the council for final decision in early February (first meeting in February).