Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic And Workforce Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances series of workforce, prison-industry and licensing bills; expands Fresh Start proposal
Summary
A Senate committee on Economic and Workforce Development on Oct. 12 reported out a package of bills updating employment-security rules, employer contribution timing, a one-door interagency study, telework policy, prison work-release and prison-industry code changes, and an expansion of the Fresh Start occupational-licensing proposal.
Get email alerts on the Economic And Workforce Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A Senate committee on Economic and Workforce Development on Oct. 12 reported out a set of bills aimed at updating employment-security rules, adjusting employer contribution calculations, studying an interagency “one-door” service model, setting telework policy guidance for state agencies, expanding work-release partnerships and modernizing prison industries code, and broadening the Fresh Start occupational-licensure provisions for applicants with criminal records.
Committee staff described Senate Bill 22-85 as “a technical amendment” to fingerprinting requirements for anyone handling secure financial information for the Mississippi Department of Employment Security. The staff member said the change was required by federal guidance and offered to answer questions on the packet.
The committee also advanced Senate Bill 22-86, which moves the timing used to calculate employer contribution rates — the factor for workforce enhancement training funds — from a December measurement to September so employers can be notified earlier of rate changes. “This does not increase or decrease in any way, the percentages,” the committee staff member said, adding the shift is intended only to provide more lead time to employers.
Senate Bill 22-90, advanced as a committee substitute, would create a task force to study a “one-door” policy modeled on a Utah approach that coordinates unemployment and benefit services across agencies. The staff member said the proposal is intended to improve interagency coordination and to position the state to seek an exception under the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act if a future reauthorization allows it.
A telework bill not on the original agenda also was reported out. Committee staff said the language is being coordinated with the state Personnel Board and aims to give agencies flexibility to use remote work while guarding against abuse. The measure is expected to be refined as it moves toward the floor.
On corrections-related workforce items, the committee reported out Senate Bill 23-57, which would authorize a contract between the Mississippi Department of Corrections and the Greenwood-LeFlore-Carroll Economic Development Foundation to operate a work-release program. Committee discussion noted previous, smaller work-release programs produced notable results for returning citizens — including one person who reportedly accumulated about $30,000 while employed through a program — and that pay for participants should be comparable to off-the-street wages.
Senate Bill 22-88 would update code sections of the Mississippi Prison Industries Act of 1990, the statute governing the entity commonly known as Magcor (Mississippi Prison Industries Corporation), to align its operations with the state’s broader workforce-development priorities. The committee staff said the changes are meant to streamline formation and operating language so prison-industry activities support high-wage, high-demand sectors identified by the state workforce strategy.
The committee’s largest item, Senate Bill 22-48 (committee substitute No. 1), would expand the Fresh Start Act’s approach to occupational licensing. The substitute would limit the use of broad terms such as “good character” or “moral turpitude” as blanket disqualifiers and require licensing authorities to consider specific criminal-history facts. It would allow applicants to request a determination of eligibility before investing time and money in training and certification. Committee members asked for a list of licensing boards included and excluded; the staff member said exclusions exist and that a list would be provided for further consideration. Senator Parker raised concerns about whether certain high-risk professions or specific criminal histories should be handled differently and asked to work with sponsors on language.
Votes at a glance
- Senate Bill 22-85 (MDES fingerprinting technical amendment): motion titled “sufficient do pass”; reported out of committee. - Senate Bill 22-86 (timing for employer contribution calculation): motion titled “sufficient due pass”; reported out of committee. - Senate Bill 22-90 (committee substitute; study task force for a one-door policy): motion titled “sufficient due pass committee sub”; reported out of committee. - Telework bill (not on agenda; personnel board coordination): motion reported out of committee. - Senate Bill 23-57 (work-release partnership with Greenwood-LeFlore-Carroll Economic Development Foundation): motion titled “sufficient due pass”; reported out of committee. - Senate Bill 22-88 (updates to Mississippi Prison Industries Act of 1990 / Magcor code sections): motion titled “sufficient to pass”; reported out of committee. - Senate Bill 22-48 (committee substitute No. 1, Fresh Start expansion for occupational licensing): motion titled “sufficient due pass committee”; reported out of committee.
What this means next
All items were reported out of committee for further consideration by the full Senate. Committee staff said several measures will have additional drafting or coordination before floor action, including the telework language and a list of boards excluded from the Fresh Start expansion.
The committee discussion distinguished technical or timing adjustments (SB 22-85, SB 22-86), study and coordination work (SB 22-90), policy updates to state corrections and prison industries (SB 23-57, SB 22-88), and a substantive licensure reform effort (SB 22-48). Questions from committee members focused on implementation details — which boards are included or excluded from Fresh Start, how pay rates for work-release participants will be set, and how telework policies will be enforced.
No roll-call vote tallies were recorded in the committee transcript; each bill was advanced on a motion recorded in the hearing as “sufficient do pass,” “sufficient due pass,” or a similar form and noted as reported out of committee.

