Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Dei topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mississippi House approves ban on certain DEI practices in public schools and colleges
Summary
After hours of debate, the Mississippi House passed House Bill 11‑93 to prohibit public schools and state institutions from requiring diversity statements, training or teaching what the bill calls "divisive concepts." The measure passed 74‑41 and will be held for possible reconsideration in February.
The Mississippi House of Representatives passed House Bill 11‑93 on a 74‑41 vote after more than two hours of floor debate that drew strong support and sharp opposition.
The bill, presented by a member identifying himself as the bill's primary author (Representative, District 35), prohibits public K‑12 schools, state‑accredited nonpublic schools and public postsecondary institutions from requiring or compelling applicants, students or employees to produce "diversity statements," participate in certain "diversity training" or endorse a list of ideas the bill labels "divisive concepts." Supporters said the measure protects academic freedom and prevents coercive practices. Opponents said it would silence discussion and roll back efforts to address race, gender and historical inequality.
Advocates described the bill as limiting three specific practices: requiring written diversity statements as part of job or admissions processes; compelling employees or students to participate in training that advances particular viewpoints; and mandating public endorsement of policies described in the measure. The text lists examples it calls divisive concepts, such as language asserting that any race, sex or religion is inherently superior to another or that individuals bear collective moral guilt because of their race or sex.
Opponents — including Representatives who spoke during the floor debate — warned the law could curtail classroom discussion, hamper college programs and expose institutions to legal challenges. Several speakers asked where the line would fall between permissible academic study and forbidden advocacy. The bill includes multiple exceptions, including compliance with federal law, accreditation requirements and the collection of demographic statistics.
Supporters pointed to the bill's exemptions for federally required reporting and for materials tied to academic accreditation, and said courts would resolve any legal questions that arise. The House also included a provision allowing the attorney general to enforce the law and for private causes of action; the bill contains a severability clause to preserve other provisions if a court strikes any part down.
After the vote, Representative David Rosebud (Tallahatchie County) asked that the House hold any motion to reconsider until February; the clerk was directed to notify the committee chairs and the motion was entered as requested.
The bill now moves to the Senate. Its passage in the House followed a contentious floor session in which members debated whether the measure would protect freedom of speech and academic freedom or would instead silence discussion of race, gender and other topics in classrooms and hiring decisions.
Supporters and critics said legal challenges or clarifications by courts are likely if the measure takes effect.
Mississippi's House recorded the final passage 74 yeas, 41 nays. The House also recorded a motion to hold reconsideration; the motion was entered and the clerk directed to notify committee leadership.
