Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Sessions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rep. Veil pitches annual legislative sessions to give lawmakers more timely flexibility; hearings show mixed reaction
Summary
Representative Landon Veil proposed moving North Dakota from a biennial session to annual sessions (beginning 2027) while keeping an overall 80‑day limit, arguing the change would improve responsiveness, continuity under term limits and legislative efficiency.
Representative Landon Veil (District 17, Grand Forks) told the committee House Bill 1408 would transition North Dakota to annual legislative sessions beginning in 2027 while preserving an 80-day total limit. “This bill represents a proactive approach to modernizing our legislative process,” Veil said, adding that annual sessions would allow the Legislature to respond faster to economic changes, preserve institutional knowledge under term limits and give interim committees more time to refine policy.
Veil said the bill would not increase total days of legislative work; instead it would distribute those days across years and give Legislative Management flexibility to set the structure and timing of sessions. He argued that splitting time would make interim committee research and public engagement more meaningful and help newer lawmakers gain experience more quickly.
Representative Scott Louser (District 5, Minot), who has opposed similar measures in the past, outlined potential procedural benefits he sees if annual sessions are implemented differently: more meaningful standing-committee work throughout the year, better vetting of bills in interim months, and fewer rushed decisions during the short biennial session. Louser suggested using standing committees year round in place of some interim processes so committees could hear, refine and recommend bills incrementally.
Opposition testimony touched on two recurrent concerns. First, several witnesses — including Felipe Vasquez of the North Dakota Young Republicans — said annual sessions could make legislative service harder for working, part‑time legislators and those in agriculture or seasonal industries. Vasquez said annual meetings could increase year‑to‑year time away from home and work. Second, Representative Steiner and others asked how much power Legislative Management would have to set logistics and whether that might concentrate authority over what bills are considered; Veil said the body would be accountable because members elect legislative management.
Committee members and witnesses also discussed varying models used in other states but representatives repeatedly said the bill was intended to preserve the 80‑day limit while improving continuity and efficiency. No formal vote or amendment was recorded at the hearing’s end; committee testimony closed and the bill remained at the committee stage.
