Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electronic Roll Call Voting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears HB 49 to add electronic roll‑call voting; discussion centers on transparency, cost and constitutional limits
Summary
House members introduced House Bill 49 to permit electronic roll‑call voting in the chamber; presenters cited a University of Vermont study and NCSL resources, estimated time savings of about two days and an upfront IT cost estimate of roughly $450,000–$700,000; no vote was taken and the committee asked for more feedback at a future meeting.
Committee members heard an introduction to House Bill 49 on Jan. 30, a proposal to implement electronic roll‑call voting for the House. Sponsors described the measure as bipartisan and said the goal is to increase transparency and efficiency in roll‑call votes.
The lead presenter, identified in the meeting as Representative Chin, cited a University of Vermont study and an NCSL (National Conference of State Legislatures) review. “When the UVM folks did the paper on it, they estimated it would save a little over 2 days of our time,” Representative Chin said. The presentation said the software most states use is an XML legislative product and that the clerk's office already uses XML legislative, which could facilitate integration. The committee's IT office provided a preliminary, back‑of‑the‑envelope cost estimate in the meeting of about $450,000 to $700,000 for initial implementation.
Presenters and members discussed practical features: some systems display an on‑screen scoreboard showing yeas and nays in real time; others show member names and how each member voted. Members asked whether the system would require roll calls for every vote; staff and members clarified that state constitutional rules limit when roll calls are required (for governor vetoes and when requested by a threshold of members) and that the bill as drafted would not automatically change constitutional roll‑call requirements.
Members also raised questions about preserving statutory or constitutional protections for member explanations of votes; presenters said voter explanation functionality could be accommodated in some electronic systems. Committee members discussed chamber size, cross‑chamber adoption (whether the Senate would adopt a similar system), and the potential for electronic roll calls to increase the number of roll calls because they become quicker to run.
No committee vote or formal referral occurred; the sponsors said the bill introduction was for discussion and that the committee would hold further meetings to gather feedback and proposals from other members. The committee chair invited additional members to present ideas and signaled the committee would schedule another session for further discussion.
