Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local‑governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves 30‑day requirement for municipal councils to fill vacancies, cities seek longer window

2251666 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB 2426 would require municipal councils to fill vacancies within 30 calendar days; the League of Arizona Cities and Towns opposed the 30‑day timeline as too short for some jurisdictions, and the committee advanced the bill while members asked the sponsor to work on an amendment for a longer period.

The committee returned House Bill 2426 with a due‑pass recommendation, advancing a bill that would require a municipal council to fill a vacancy within 30 calendar days of a vacancy notice.

Representative Collin, the bill sponsor, said the requirement responds to situations — including a recent Fountain Hills council vacancy — where councils had no statutory deadline and could leave residents unrepresented for extended periods. "There needs to be some certainty with respect to when that vacancy needs to be filled," he told the committee.

Jane Ahern, representing the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, testified in respectful opposition and asked the sponsor to consider a longer timeframe. Ahern told the committee that some city and town councils do not meet frequently and can have difficulty recruiting applicants; "30 days just might not be quite enough time for some city and town councils to be able to go through the appointment process," she said, and suggested the sponsor consider increasing the period.

Isaac Glover testified in favor, describing a local case in Fountain Hills where he said a recent winner was not appointed to serve until months later. Members discussed options such as special meetings to recruit and appoint candidates.

After discussion the committee recorded four ayes and three present and returned the bill with a due‑pass recommendation; several members asked the sponsor to work with the League to propose an amendment lengthening the timeline before further consideration.