Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Foreign Policy Divestment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Multiple speakers urge Denver Council to back Gaza ceasefire or divest; local Jewish group urges focus on local issues
Summary
Several public commenters at Jan. 21’s Denver City Council public comment session urged the council to pass a ceasefire resolution and to divest from entities linked to Israel; a representative of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Colorado urged local focus and rejection of antisemitism.
Speakers at Denver’s Jan. 21 public comment session expressed sharply differing views on the Israel-Hamas conflict and on whether the city should take divestment or ceasefire positions.
Arnie Carter, speaking in the council chambers, urged the council to ‘‘pass a resolution for a permanent cease fire in in Gaza to stop arming Israel and stop investing in Israel, divest from Israel.’’ Several other callers echoed calls for divestment and for the city to stop any international support they consider complicit in human-rights abuses.
By contrast, Matt Most of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Colorado said the recent ceasefire ‘‘brings renewed hope’’ and urged Coloradans to reject antisemitic narratives. ‘‘Middle East conflict is not an issue for our city councils and municipal governments,’’ Most added, urging focus on local priorities and reconciliation.
Other speakers, including Mary Hansen and Jesse (Jessica) Paris, also called on the council to end ‘‘international support’’ for what they described as oppressive policies and to pursue divestment from companies linked to Israel. Eric Gross, another commenter, stated that ‘‘9 Palestinians were murdered by Israel in the West Bank today’’ and criticized past council decorum and policing responses to protesters.
Why it matters: Public comment reflects active community debate about whether a municipal government should take positions on international conflicts and on how local institutions should respond to calls for divestment. Council practice determines whether such topics advance to formal agenda items or remain statements from the public.
None of the speakers presented a formal resolution or recorded council action during the public comment period. Comments ranged from requests for a council resolution to appeals for the council to prioritize local challenges over international policy.
Ending: The council did not take a vote on the matters raised during the public comment period; speakers were invited to submit written comments or appear again at a subsequent session.
