Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annex Cos topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Councilors previewed Annex COS draft goals, mapping and suitability zones at interactive work session

2251102 · January 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff and consultants briefed council on the Annex COS project: a data-driven annexation suitability model, a set of draft goals and policies, and 'sustainability zones' intended to help prioritize where the city may pursue annexation.

City planning staff and the Annex COS consultant team presented an interactive work session Jan. 14 outlining draft annexation goals, mapping and a suitability analysis intended to guide future annexation decisions.

Katie Carleo, land-use review manager, and Brian English of Colorado Springs Utilities co-manage the project; Logan Simpson consultants described the analysis and mapping that produced 22 annexation-suitability zones in the city’s three-mile planning boundary. Consultant Megan Moore described public outreach to date, including summer speaker panels and technical and focus-group briefings; Cameron Gloss and Ben Ochsling presented policy and GIS results.

The consultants said they combined multiple criteria to score parcels for annexation suitability: infrastructure (including Colorado Springs Utilities’ internal prioritization), transportation proximity, contiguity to city limits, assessor parcel size and vacancy, and exclusion or reduction layers such as federal lands, steep slopes and other utility districts. Each parcel received weights and scores that rolled up into suitability zones. The team emphasized that the mapping is 1 input in a broader process that also includes fiscal analysis from utilities and other policy priorities.

Draft high-level goals presented to council include focusing Annex COS work within the city’s area of planning interest and three-mile boundary; prioritizing annexations that align with planned public facilities and services; analyzing fiscal impacts so growth “pays its own way”; and preserving council discretion to annex for specific community benefits or public-health reasons. Staff said the Annex COS draft will be refined after tonight’s community open house and council input and is expected to be returned to council for public hearings and adoption in March.

Council members pressed for clarifications on how the maps would change if the council acts on specific annexations (staff said maps would be updated) and on how utilities’ growth and water constraints were incorporated. Colorado Springs Utilities representatives said the utilities growth model and water-supply analysis are being integrated with the suitability mapping. Staff reiterated that the Annex COS document is a tool to inform, not automatically require, future annexation decisions.

The consultant team invited public comment at an open house the evening of Jan. 14 and described next steps — internal working-group review, document refinements in February, and final adoption hearings anticipated in March.