Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate moves to tighten theft penalties after split debate over costs and deterrence
Summary
Senate Bill 19 would raise misdemeanor penalties for certain theft‑related offenses and reinstate higher local jail terms for repeat offenders; supporters say it will deter retail theft, opponents cite fiscal and capacity concerns.
The Montana Senate on Feb. 5 approved committee passage of Senate Bill 19, a bill that revises sentencing for theft‑related offenses and raises misdemeanor penalties that were changed by a 2017 reform law. Sponsor Senator Usher said the measure restores pre‑2017 penalties to deter increasing retail theft and other property crimes.
Usher described the earlier 2017 reform (HB 133 of 2017) as having unintentionally created a profit incentive for thieves by setting low fines for higher‑value thefts. Under SB 19, the penal consequences for repeated low‑level theft would include up to 6 months in county jail and fines up to $1,500 for certain misdemeanors; thefts above the felony threshold would retain felony penalties (up to 10 years and fines up to $50,000). "Please help make stealing illegal again with some penalties that match the crime and will help deter thieves," Usher urged in committee.
Opponents cited the bill’s fiscal note and cautioned that raising misdemeanor incarceration would increase jail populations and burdens on county jails and the Office of Public Defender. Senator Boldman pointed to fiscal projections and argued the change would place poor defendants in jail and increase state costs. County and law‑enforcement capacity were recurring concerns; some supporters said the measure responds to a measurable increase in retail theft.
Committee vote and outcome: The committee recommended SB 19 do pass, 32–18. The committee report was forwarded to the floor and the bill passed second reading in committee where recorded.
Why this matters: The measure alters sentencing policy with possible downstream effects on county jails, public‑defender caseloads, and state correctional spending. Supporters framed the change as restoring effective deterrence; opponents raised fiscal and capacity concerns and warned it could increase incarceration of indigent defendants.
Provenance (topic intro/finish): - topicintro evidence: block_id="3736" evidence_excerpt:"Senate bill 19 introduced by OSHA. A bill for an act entitled an act, generally revising sentencing laws for theft..." (title read on the floor) - topfinish evidence: block_id="4910" evidence_excerpt:"Mister Chairman, 32 senators vote aye and 18 senators vote nay. The 32 vote aye and 18 voting no. Senate bill number 19 passes second reading." (vote tally)
