Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities And‑rates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Township leaders and residents urge Trumbull County commissioners to pause proposed water‑district rate hikes

2250937 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Several Brookfield and Howland township officials and residents urged the Trumbull County commissioners to reconsider or phase any proposed increases to the county water district rates, citing impacts on seniors and low‑income households and asking for township coordination and alternative options.

Township trustees and residents urged the Board of Trumbull County Commissioners to reconsider a proposed increase in Trumbull County water district rates and to seek alternatives or phased approaches to lessen the financial impact on seniors and other vulnerable residents.

Multiple public commenters — including Brookfield Township Trustee Dan Settles and Howland Township representatives — told commissioners they would adopt resolutions opposing any county water‑district rate increase that would directly affect township residents. Settles said Brookfield residents, many of them seniors, “absorbed” previous rate adjustments and requested any future increases be phased in rather than applied as a single large jump. Howland Township officials said their district had historically been one of the more stable and that the proposed increase (discussed at prior meetings) could be as high as about 82.6% for some districts, creating serious affordability concerns.

Commissioners acknowledged the issue and said they were exploring options, including meeting with external water suppliers such as Niles and Warren to better understand why wholesale charges to the county have risen. Commissioners noted they had discussed alternatives with the county sanitary engineer and asked staff to look for incremental approaches or other stopgap measures. The board said there was currently no final decision and that a sales‑tax increase was not being pursued at this time.

Why it matters: A large, immediate increase in municipal water rates would affect thousands of county residents, with outsized consequences for low‑income and senior households. Township leaders urged intergovernmental coordination and transparency about how wholesale charges and county billing are determined.

Ending: Commissioners asked the county sanitary engineer to report back on options, and trustees said they would circulate resolutions opposing immediate increases; the board invited further township input before any final decision.