Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Trees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council to inspect trees near Bloomington and Morrell after sight-line and ordinance concerns

2250333 · February 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilmembers raised safety concerns about trees and plantings north of Morrell Street that may obstruct sight-lines at intersections and potentially violate tree-spacing rules. The council directed staff to inspect the area and return with recommendations.

Councilmembers raised safety and ordinance-enforcement concerns about trees planted near Bloomington and Morrell streets, and directed staff to inspect the locations and return to the council with recommendations.

A councilmember told the meeting that current setback language for corner vision clearance — stated in the meeting as 20 feet from intersection property lines — should be extended to 25 or 30 feet in some locations to improve sight lines for drivers and school-related traffic. The same speaker noted several trees north of Morrell that appear to be planted too closely together and said one small tree blocks a no-parking sign.

City staff said the trees in question are on city property in the right-of-way and that the city has historically used a permissive process that allows planting with permission from the public-works director; one councilmember suggested removing the permission option so plantings would be disallowed on city-owned rights-of-way. Staff also reported the homeowner adjacent to several of the trees had previously been contacted and was upset; the council discussed options including paying a homeowner’s planting costs if the city removes trees, and involving the city attorney to resolve rights and process.

Councilmembers agreed to an on-site inspection before taking enforcement action. One councilmember said, “I’ll bring it back in next week,” and another clerk recorded direction to bring the item back on a subsequent agenda in two weeks so the council could decide after a field review.

No formal amendment to the city code or an immediate vote was taken; the council’s action at the meeting was to direct staff to inspect the area and report back with findings and recommendations.