Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Attempt to eliminate city DEI position fails to advance after no second
Summary
Councilman Holloman introduced Resolution 37–20–24–25, requesting elimination of the city’s diversity, equity and inclusion position. The motion did not receive a second and therefore did not proceed to a substantive council vote.
Councilman Holloman introduced Resolution 37–20–24–25 on Feb. 6, which the transcript identifies as a city resolution requesting elimination of the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) position. Holloman stated the resolution and moved for its approval; the motion did not receive a second and therefore did not advance to a roll call vote.
During the council comment period that followed, several council members addressed the broader subject. Councilman Chandler characterized DEI efforts as aligned with ideologies he opposes and referenced external books and commentators to support his view. Councilman Zacharias and others urged reflection on the meaning of silence and how council members’ actions or inaction convey positions. Councilman McLaughlin and Councilman Lovato spoke on unrelated notices and committee matters.
Because the resolution failed to secure a second, there was no recorded vote tally on adoption or rejection. The transcript does not show any administrative or staff direction tied to Resolution 37, nor does it record any staff report on the DEI position’s duties, budget, or statutory authority. No final action on the DEI position appears in the meeting record.
The council adjourned after completing the evening’s business; the record shows no further action on the subject at this meeting.
